TOEFL TPO -1 Academic Discussion Writing Sample: Your professor is teaching a class on human resource management. Write a post responding to the professor's question.
真实用户提交的答案,配合AI智能评估与反馈
共有 29 份用户提交的样本
开始免费练习题目概览
Professor
This week, we'll be discussing how technological advances are transforming the job market, making some jobs unnecessary. Let's focus on government actions. Suppose the government had to choose between two ways in which to support people whose jobs are no longer needed. The government could either give them enough money to live on until they find new jobs or offer them free job training without giving them money directly. Which of these two solutions do you think is better? Why?
Student A
I believe that the government should prioritize providing free job training opportunities. Modern training programs are usually costly, which means that many people will not be able to afford them without the government's funding. By participating in training programs, people will develop new, in demand skills and become more competitive in the job market.
Student B
Although I agree that having access to free training programs sounds promising, I think the government's first step should be to give people enough money to live on until they find new jobs. This money will go directly into people's pockets and allow them to make their own choices concerning
用户样本与评估结果
用户样本
While it is undeniable that financial aid would help those who in between jobs greatly, but only on those who are willing to find a new occupation actively. One can not lose sight of the fact that some of the unemployed citizens would be happy with the money that they have been given and thus too reluctant to find a new job, feeding on government aid only. It goes without saying that offering free job training will definitely motivate unemployed ones to find a new job since they are equipped with new skills that are once too expensive to learn, thanks to the government. There is also the fact that those unemployed ones searching for jobs unsuccessfully might because they do not have the skill the job requires, and by offering free job training they are more likely to get more job opportunities. So I would say that offering job training without giving actual money is better.
评估结果
1. 子项得分
-
Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.5
-
Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 4.0
-
Language Use and Grammar: 4.0
2. 预估分数
- 27
3. 任务完成度
这篇文章基本上完成了任务要求,对问题进行了回答并提出了观点。但是,文章可以在以下方面进行改进:
-
提供更具体的例子来支持观点。
-
对反对意见进行简要讨论,以使论证更全面。
改进示例:
-
Example 1: "For instance, the government could partner with local tech companies to provide training in software development, which is a high-demand skill in today's job market."
-
Example 2: "However, it is important to consider that some individuals may still struggle financially even with job training, so a combination of both financial aid and job training might be the most effective solution."
4. 文章结构与组织
文章的结构和组织方面基本合理,包括引言、正文和结论。然而,在以下方面可以进行改进:
-
在引言中明确提出自己的观点。
-
在段落之间使用更清晰的过渡词或短语。
改进示例:
-
Example 1: "In my opinion, offering free job training without giving actual money is a more effective solution for supporting people whose jobs are no longer needed."
-
Example 2: "On the other hand, providing financial aid might lead to dependency on government support and discourage active job-seeking behavior."
5. 语法批改
While it is undeniable that financial aid would help those who in between jobs greatly, but only on those who are willing to find a new occupation actively. One can not lose sight of the fact that some of the unemployed citizens would be happy with the money that they have been given and thus too reluctant to find a new job, feeding on government aid only. It goes without saying that offering free job training will definitely motivate unemployed ones to find a new job since they are equipped with new skills that are once too expensive to learn, thanks to the government. There is also the fact that those unemployed ones searching for jobs unsuccessfully might because they do not have the skill the job requires, and by offering free job training they are more likely to get more job opportunities. So I would say that offering job training without giving actual money is better.
Title: 6 文章修订
In considering the government's role in supporting individuals whose jobs have become obsolete due to technological advancements, it is essential to weigh the potential benefits and drawbacks of providing financial assistance versus offering free job training. While financial aid may offer immediate relief, it could inadvertently encourage complacency among recipients who may not actively seek new employment opportunities. On the other hand, investing in free job training programs empowers individuals by equipping them with valuable, in-demand skills that were previously unattainable due to prohibitive costs. Furthermore, addressing skill gaps in the workforce not only increases an individual's employability but also contributes to a more competitive and dynamic job market. Therefore, prioritizing job training over direct monetary support presents a more sustainable and impactful solution for those affected by the rapidly evolving employment landscape. (136 words)
Revised essay: Title: 7 文章批改
While it is undeniable that financial aid would help those who are in between jobs greatly, but greatly (removed "but" for smoother sentence flow), it would only on benefit those who are actively willing to find a new occupation actively. occupation. One can not cannot lose sight of the fact that some of the unemployed citizens would might be happy content with the money that they have been given and thus too reluctant to find a new job, feeding relying solely on government aid only. aid. It goes without saying that offering free job training will definitely motivate the unemployed ones to find a new job since they are will be equipped with new skills that are were once too expensive to learn, thanks to the government. government's support (rephrased for clarity). There is also the fact that those unemployed ones searching for jobs unsuccessfully might be struggling because they do not have the skill the job requires, and skills required by potential employers; by offering free job training they training, these individuals are more likely to get more job opportunities. So gain access to better job opportunities (rephrased for clarity and conciseness). So, I would say argue that offering job training without giving actual money providing direct financial assistance is better.a more effective approach (rephrased for stronger conclusion).
8 思维导图
- Government's role
- Supporting individuals
- Jobs obsolete due to technology
- Financial assistance
- Benefits
- Immediate relief
- Drawbacks
- Encourages complacency
- Lack of active job seeking
- Free job training programs
- Empowers individuals
- Valuable, in-demand skills
- Overcomes prohibitive costs
- Addressing skill gaps in workforce
- Increases employability
- Contributes to competitive job market
- Conclusion
- Prioritize job training over monetary support
9 关键词
| Word | Phonetic Symbol | Part of Speech | English Definition | Simplified Chinese Translation | Sample Sentence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| obsolete | /əbˈsəʊ.liːt/ | adjective | No longer produced or used; out of date | 过时的 | Technological advancements have made some jobs obsolete. |
| complacency | /kəmˈpleɪ.sən.si/ | noun | A feeling of quiet pleasure or security, often while unaware of potential danger or defects | 自满 | Financial aid may encourage complacency among recipients. |
| empowerment | /ɪmˈpaʊə.mənt/ | noun | The process of gaining freedom and power to do what you want or control what happens to you | 赋权 | Job training programs provide empowerment to individuals by teaching them valuable skills. |
| prohibitive | /prəˈhɪb.ɪ.tɪv/ | adjective | _Too expensive for most people; preventing something from being done or used | 禁止性的 | The prohibitive costs of job training can be overcome by offering free programs. |
| skill gap | /skɪl ɡæp/ | noun | The difference between the skills needed for a job and the skills possessed by employees | 技能差距 | Addressing skill gaps in the workforce can increase employability. |
| employability | /ɪmˌplɔɪəˈbɪl.ə.ti/ | noun | _The quality of having the skills, knowledge, and experience that employers want | 就业能力 | _Job training programs improve an individual's employability in a competitive market. |
| dynamic | /daɪˈnæm.ɪk/ | _adjective | _Characterized by constant change, activity, or progress | _充满活力的 | _A well-trained workforce contributes to a more dynamic job market. |
| evolving | /ɪˈvɒl.vɪŋ/ | _adjective | _Gradually changing and developing over time | _不断发展的 | _The rapidly evolving employment landscape requires individuals to adapt and learn new skills. |
| prioritize | /praɪˈər.aɪt.aɪz/ | _verb | _To decide which things are most important and deal with them first | _优先考虑 | _It is important to prioritize job training over direct monetary support for those affected by job loss. |
学术讨论评分标准
托福学术讨论任务基于ETS官方评分标准进行评估。AI评估系统从多个维度分析每个回答。
相关性与贡献
回答是否针对问题并为讨论做出有意义的贡献?
语言运用
语法准确性、词汇丰富度和句式结构质量。
论述与支撑
观点是否充分展开,是否有具体例子和清晰推理支撑?
回答中的常见模式
基于对该题目用户提交内容的分析,以下是在学生回答中观察到的常见模式。
很多学生能清楚表达观点,但缺乏具体的论据支撑。
高分回答会直接引用阅读段落和其他发言者的观点。
更高分的回答使用多样化的句式结构和学术词汇。
时间管理是关键因素——匆忙完成的回答在论述发展方面得分较低。
学习建议
在开始写作前仔细阅读题目,理清问题的所有组成部分。
在回答中引用阅读段落和其他同学的观点。
使用具体例子来支持你的主要论点——避免笼统的表述。
目标字数120-150词。更长的回答不一定更好;清晰度和针对性更重要。
进行限时练习(10分钟),在考试条件下提升写作流畅度。
常见问题
什么是托福学术讨论任务?
学术讨论任务如何评分?
本页面上的用户样本是什么?
AI评估的准确度如何?
如何练习这道学术讨论题目?
学术讨论回答应该多长?
相关托福学术讨论题目
All TOEFL Writing Samples
Browse all user-submitted TOEFL writing samples with AI evaluation
TOEFL Academic Discussion Guide
Learn strategies and tips for the Academic Discussion writing task
TOEFL Writing Guide
Complete guide to all TOEFL writing task types and scoring
TOEFL Speaking Guide
Master all TOEFL speaking tasks with expert strategies
TOEFL Reading Guide
Strategies for TOEFL reading comprehension tasks
TOEFL Listening Guide
Tips and practice for TOEFL listening comprehension