TOEFLIELTS
☰
All Samples

TOEFL Academic Discussion Writing Sample: Your professor is teaching a class on financial. Write a post responding to the professor’s question.

真实用户提交的答案,配合AI智能评估与反馈

共有 1 份用户提交的样本

开始免费练习

题目概览

Professor

In group projects, is it better to let people work on their own and then combine their works, or is it better to collaborate in every step?

Student A

independent work and then combine

Student B

collaborate every step

用户样本与评估结果

练习同类托福写作题 →

将打开 LingoLeap App 的写作题目列表,而不是本题。练习需要免费账号。AI 评分会消耗积分,但 Practice Test 1(PQ26-1)中的题目每天可免费评分 3 次。

1

用户样本 #1

As far as I am concerned, I tend to be in favor of the argument that employees should work independently and then combine their results, due to its co...

分数
28

用户样本

As far as I am concerned, I tend to be in favor of the argument that employees should work independently and then combine their results, due to its contribution to working efficiency. To begin with, when working on a large project, it is obvious that there are numerous diversified processes generally. Thus, in order to promote the working efficiency, it is a smart move to work separately, as every subordinate could specialize in a particular unit. The more time the worker distributes on the same facet, the more efficient he will be. Therefore, the whole process could be accomplished in a relatively high working efficiency in comparison with collaborating every step. For example, in the large software enterprises, such as Google and Amazon, every software develop engineer will take responsible for a specific step. Some are specialized in computer network, while others spend all the time testing the programmes. In this case, every bug could find an engineer who is responsible for, reducing bugs and raising efficiency. In conclusion, only by separating work could a firm increase working efficiency.

评估结果

1. 子项得分

  • Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.5

  • Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 4.0

  • Language Use and Grammar: 4.0

2. 预估分数

  • Estimated Score: 28

3. 任务完成度

这篇文章在完成任务方面做得相当不错,有效地表达了作者的观点,并为讨论作出了贡献。然而,有一些方面仍有改进的空间。首先,可以提供更多具体的例子来支持观点。其次,在引入对立观点时,可以稍微展开讨论,以使文章更加全面。

改进建议示例(英文):

  1. Instead of only mentioning Google and Amazon, provide specific examples of how their employees work independently on different aspects of a project, leading to increased efficiency.

  2. Briefly discuss the potential drawbacks of collaborating at every step, such as increased time spent on communication or potential conflicts between team members.

4. 文章结构与组织

文章的结构和组织方面基本上是清晰的,包括引言、正文和结论。然而,在段落划分和过渡方面还有待改进。建议在每个段落中专注于一个主要观点,并使用明确的过渡词或短语来连接不同的想法。

改进建议示例(英文):

  1. Divide the essay into separate paragraphs for introduction, main argument, supporting examples, counterargument (if applicable), and conclusion.

  2. Use transition words or phrases such as "Firstly," "In addition," "On the other hand," and "In conclusion" to guide the reader through the essay and signal shifts in focus.

5. 语法批改

As far as I am concerned, I tend to be in favor of the argument that employees should work independently and then combine their results, due to its contribution to working efficiency. To begin with, when working on a large project, it is obvious that there are numerous diversified processes generally. Thus, in order to promote the working efficiency, it is a smart move to work separately, as every subordinate could specialize in a particular unit. The more time the worker distributes on the same facet, the more efficient he will be. Therefore, the whole process could be accomplished in a relatively high working efficiency in comparison with collaborating every step. For example, in the large software enterprises, such as Google and Amazon, every software developdevelops(punctuation + singular noun + plural verb) engineer will take responsible for a specific step. Some are specialized in computer network, while others spend all the time testing the programmesprograms(misspelling). In this case, every bug could find an engineer who is responsible for, reducing bugs and raising efficiency. In conclusion, only by separating work could a firm increase working efficiency.

Section Title: 6 文章修订

In response to the professor's question, I firmly believe that allowing individuals to work independently before combining their efforts leads to greater efficiency in group projects. In large-scale projects, it is common for various specialized tasks to be present. By assigning these tasks to individuals with expertise in those areas, the overall efficiency of the project can be significantly improved.

For instance, major software companies like Google and Amazon often delegate specific responsibilities to their software development engineers. Some may focus on computer networking, while others dedicate their time to testing programs. This division of labor ensures that each aspect of the project is handled by someone with the appropriate skills and knowledge, ultimately reducing errors and increasing productivity.

By encouraging independent work followed by collaboration, organizations can capitalize on the strengths of each team member while also fostering a sense of unity when it comes time to combine individual contributions. This approach not only promotes efficiency but also allows for a more seamless integration of diverse perspectives and ideas within the final product. (178 words)

As far as In response to the professor's question (clarifies the context of the discussion), I am concerned, I tend to be in favor of the argument firmly believe that employees should allowing individuals to work independently and then combine before combining their results, due to its contribution to working efficiency. To begin with, when working on a large project, efforts (rephrased for clarity) leads to greater efficiency in group projects. In large-scale projects, it is obvious that there are numerous diversified processes generally. Thus, common for various specialized tasks to be present (rephrased for natural tone). By assigning these tasks to individuals with expertise in order to promote the working efficiency, it is a smart move to work separately, as every subordinate could specialize in a particular unit. The more time the worker distributes those areas, the overall efficiency of the project can be significantly improved (rephrased for clarity and conciseness).

For instance, major software companies like Google and Amazon often delegate specific responsibilities to their software development engineers (provides concrete examples). Some may focus on the same facet, the more efficient he will be. Therefore, the whole process could be accomplished in a relatively high working efficiency in comparison with collaborating every step. For example, in the large software enterprises, such as Google and Amazon, every software develop engineer will take responsible for a specific step. Some are specialized in computer network, networking, while others spend all the dedicate their time to testing the programmes. In this case, every bug could find an engineer who programs (clarifies roles within the example). This division of labor ensures that each aspect of the project is responsible for, handled by someone with the appropriate skills and knowledge, ultimately reducing bugs and raising efficiency. In conclusion, errors and increasing productivity (explains benefits).

By encouraging independent work followed by collaboration, organizations can capitalize on the strengths of each team member while also fostering a sense of unity when it comes time to combine individual contributions (summarizes main point). This approach not only by separating work could promotes efficiency but also allows for a firm increase working efficiency.more seamless integration of diverse perspectives and ideas within the final product (highlights additional benefits).

8 思维导图


- 主题:独立工作与团队协作相结合提高效率
  - 大型项目中的专业任务分配
    - 个人专长与知识
    - 提高整体效率
  - 具体实例:谷歌和亚马逊软件开发工程师
    - 计算机网络专家
    - 软件测试专家
  - 独立工作后的团队协作
    - 利用每个成员的优势
    - 增强团队凝聚力
  - 结论:提高效率并整合多样性观点和想法

9 关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish definitionSimplified Chinese translationSample sentences
efficiency/ɪˈfɪʃənsi/nounThe ability to do something well or achieve a desired result效率Allowing individuals to work independently leads to greater efficiency in group projects.
specialize/ˈspeʃəlaɪz/verbTo focus on and become an expert in a particular subject or skill专门从事By assigning tasks to individuals who specialize in those areas, the project's efficiency is improved.
delegate/ˈdelɪɡeɪt/verbTo give a task or responsibility to someone else委派Google and Amazon often delegate specific responsibilities to their software development engineers.
division of labor/dɪˈvɪʒən əv ˈleɪbər/nounThe assignment of different tasks to different people劳动分工This division of labor ensures that each aspect of the project is handled by someone with expertise.
productivity/ˌprɒdʌkˈtɪvɪti/nounThe rate at which goods or services are produced生产力Division of labor reduces errors and increases productivity.
collaboration/kəˌlæbəˈreɪʃən/nounThe act of working together with others to achieve a common goal合作Independent work followed by collaboration can capitalize on the strengths of each team member.
unity/ˈjuːnɪti/nounThe state of being united or joined as a whole团结Fostering a sense of unity when it comes time to combine individual contributions is important.
integration/ˌɪntɪˈɡreɪʃən/nounThe act of combining different elements into a unified whole整合This approach allows for a more seamless integration of diverse perspectives and ideas.
perspective/pərˈspektiv/nounA particular attitude or way of viewing something观点Integration of diverse perspectives and ideas within the final product is beneficial.
练习同类托福写作题 →

将打开 LingoLeap App 的写作题目列表,而不是本题。练习需要免费账号。AI 评分会消耗积分,但 Practice Test 1(PQ26-1)中的题目每天可免费评分 3 次。

学术讨论评分标准

托福学术讨论任务基于ETS官方评分标准进行评估。AI评估系统从多个维度分析每个回答。

相关性与贡献

回答是否针对问题并为讨论做出有意义的贡献?

语言运用

语法准确性、词汇丰富度和句式结构质量。

论述与支撑

观点是否充分展开,是否有具体例子和清晰推理支撑?

回答中的常见模式

基于对该题目用户提交内容的分析,以下是在学生回答中观察到的常见模式。

很多学生能清楚表达观点,但缺乏具体的论据支撑。

高分回答会直接引用阅读段落和其他发言者的观点。

更高分的回答使用多样化的句式结构和学术词汇。

时间管理是关键因素——匆忙完成的回答在论述发展方面得分较低。

学习建议

1

在开始写作前仔细阅读题目,理清问题的所有组成部分。

2

在回答中引用阅读段落和其他同学的观点。

3

使用具体例子来支持你的主要论点——避免笼统的表述。

4

目标字数120-150词。更长的回答不一定更好;清晰度和针对性更重要。

5

进行限时练习(10分钟),在考试条件下提升写作流畅度。

常见问题

什么是托福学术讨论任务?
托福学术讨论任务要求你参与在线课堂讨论。你需要阅读教授的问题和其他学生的回复,然后在约10分钟内写出自己的帖子,表达并支持你的观点。
学术讨论任务如何评分?
该任务按0-5分评分,评估维度包括与讨论的相关性、语言运用质量(语法、词汇、句式结构)以及你如何用具体例子和推理来发展和支持自己的观点。
本页面上的用户样本是什么?
这些是托福考生在LingoLeap上练习此题时提交的真实回答。每个样本都经过我们的AI评分引擎评估,提供分数和关于优势与待提升领域的详细反馈。
AI评估的准确度如何?
LingoLeap的AI评估引擎基于ETS官方评分标准训练,并与人工评分校准。虽然没有自动化系统是完美的,但它为练习目的提供了可靠的反馈,帮助识别具体的提升方向。
如何练习这道学术讨论题目?
你可以注册免费的LingoLeap账号进行练习。针对这道题目写出你自己的回答,提交后即可获得带有详细反馈的AI即时评估。
学术讨论回答应该多长?
目标字数120-150词。该任务给你10分钟写作时间。重点关注表达的清晰度、用具体例子支持观点以及引用讨论背景,而不是追求更长的篇幅。

今天就为您的目标分数加油!

与 LingoLeap,英语考试专家一起

更快达到您的理想分数

立即免费试用