TOEFLIELTS
☰
All Samples

TOEFL Academic Discussion Writing Sample: Your professor is teaching a class on business management. Write a postresponding to the professor's question. In your response you should do the following.Express and support your opinionMake a contribution to the discussion in your own words An effective response will contain at least 100 words.

真实用户提交的答案,配合AI智能评估与反馈

共有 1 份用户提交的样本

开始免费练习

题目概览

Professor

This week, we will be discussing leadership; more specifically, we will beexamining the various qualities found in all successful business leaders. To getyou thinking about this topic, I'd like you to consider the following question:What is more important for being an effective leader of a business-excellentcommunication skills or a strong technical background in a particular industry?

Amy

The best leaders are the ones who are good communicators. Ifemployees clearly understand what is expected of them-if theirleader can articulate clearly and concisely what they need todo to achieve their goals-they will be more productive andefficient in their work.

Rory

It doesn't matter how well a company's leader communicates ifthey don't have a deep understanding of the business itselfEmployees aren't going to be motivated by a companypresident who gives a great speech if it's evident that thepresident doesn't know what they do in their day-to-day work

用户样本与评估结果

练习同类托福写作题 →

将打开 LingoLeap App 的写作题目列表,而不是本题。练习需要免费账号。AI 评分会消耗积分,但 Practice Test 1(PQ26-1)中的题目每天可免费评分 3 次。

1

用户样本 #1

In response to the professor's question, I concur with Rory's viewpoint that being practical is more important for being an effective leader of a busi...

分数
27

用户样本

In response to the professor's question, I concur with Rory's viewpoint that being practical is more important for being an effective leader of a business-excellent. There are two primary reasons for my instance. Firstly, if the leader has a strong technical background, he can make a specific plan for his employees' day-to-day work, due to his careful skills and proficient techniques. As a leader, the important function is to teach his employees, how to work effectively. So, to some extent, skills can be addressed as a priority. Secondly, good communication may be inspiring, but it is all superficial and cannot be turned into reality. For example, my mother often complains to me that her boss always praises them without putting them into practice, telling them to work hard without mentioning the direction or content of their efforts. In conclusion, I think strong technical background should take precedence over communication skills.

评估结果

1.子项得分

Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.5 Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 4.0 Language Use and Grammar: 4.0

2.预估分数

Estimated Score: 27

3.任务完成度

此篇文章基本上完成了任务要求,表达了作者对于领导技能和沟通能力的看法。但是,可以在以下方面进行改进:

  1. 在论述观点时,可以加入更多具体的例子和细节,使观点更加有说服力。

  2. 文章中存在一些语法错误和不太自然的表达,需要进行修改。

示例1:将 "being practical is more important for being an effective leader of a business-excellent" 改为 "having a strong technical background is more important for being an effective business leader."

示例2:将 "due to his careful skills and proficient techniques" 改为 "due to their expertise and proficiency in the industry."

4.文章结构与组织

文章的结构和组织方面较为清晰,包括了引言、正文和结论。然而,在以下方面可以进行改进:

  1. 在段落之间增加过渡性词汇或短语,使文章更加流畅。

  2. 对于正文部分的论述,可以尝试使用对比法来强调自己的观点。

示例1:在第二段开头添加过渡性词汇:“首先,在技术背景方面,如果领导具备强大的技术背景,他可以为员工的日常工作制定具体计划。”

示例2:在正文部分加入对比论述:“虽然良好的沟通能力对于激发员工积极性有一定作用,但是在实际操作中,技术背景更能够帮助领导制定切实可行的计划和目标。”

  1. 语法批改

In response to the professor's question, I concur with Rory's viewpoint that being practical is more important for being an effective leader of a business-excellent. There are two primary reasons for my instance. Firstly, if the leader has a strong technical background, he can make a specific plan for his employees' day-to-day work, due to his careful skills and proficient techniques. As a leader, the important function is to teach his employees, how to work effectively. So, to some extent, skills can be addressed as a priority. Secondly, good communication may be inspiring, but it is all superficial and cannot be turned into reality. For example, my mother often complains to me that her boss always praises them without putting them into practice, telling them to work hard without mentioning the direction or content of their efforts. In conclusion, I think strong technical background should take precedence over communication skills.

6.文章修订

In response to the professor's question, I agree with Rory that having a strong technical background is more important for being an effective business leader. There are two primary reasons for my stance.

Firstly, a leader with a strong technical background can create specific plans for their employees' day-to-day work, due to their expertise and proficiency in the industry. As a leader, it is crucial to guide employees on how to work effectively. Therefore, technical skills should be considered a priority.

Secondly, while good communication may be inspiring, it can often be superficial and not translate into tangible results. For instance, my mother frequently complains that her boss praises them without implementing any changes or providing clear guidance on the direction or content of their efforts.

Overall, I believe that a strong technical background should take precedence over communication skills when evaluating an effective business leader. (147 words)

7.文章批改

In response to the professor's question, I concur agree with Rory's viewpoint Rory that being practical having a strong technical background is more important for being an effective leader of a business-excellent. business leader. (Changed "being practical" to "having a strong technical background" for clarity) There are two primary reasons for my instance. stance.

Firstly, if the a leader has a strong technical background, he with a strong technical background can make a create specific plan for his plans for their employees' day-to-day work, due to their expertise and proficiency in the industry. (Rephrased "due to his careful skills and proficient techniques. techniques" to "due to their expertise and proficiency in the industry" for more natural language use) As a leader, the important function it is to teach his employees, crucial to guide employees on how to work effectively. So, to some extent, Therefore, technical skills can should be addressed as considered a priority.

Secondly, while good communication may be inspiring, but it is all can often be superficial and cannot be turned not translate into reality. tangible results. (Revised sentence structure for better flow) For example, instance, my mother often frequently complains to me that her boss always praises them without putting them into practice, telling them to work hard without mentioning implementing any changes or providing clear guidance on the direction or content of their efforts. ¶ In conclusion, (Reworded this sentence for clarity)

Overall, I think believe that a strong technical background should take precedence over communication skills.skills when evaluating an effective business leader. (Minor edits for improved language use)

8.思维导图

  • Introduction

    • Agree with Rory
    • Strong technical background importance
  • Reason 1

    • Specific plans for employees
    • Expertise and proficiency in the industry
  • Reason 2

    • Good communication can be superficial
    • Lack of tangible results
  • Example

    • Mother's experience with her boss
  • Conclusion

    • Technical background takes precedence over communication skills

9.关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish DefinitionSimplified Chinese TranslationSample Sentence
precedence/ˈprɛsɪdəns/nounThe condition of being considered more important than someone or something else.优先地位A strong technical background should take precedence over communication skills.
expertise/ˌɛkspərˈtiːz/nounSpecial skill or knowledge in a particular field.专业知识A leader with expertise in the industry can create specific plans for their employees.
proficiency/prəˈfɪʃənsi/nounA high degree of competence or skill; expertise.熟练程度Proficiency in the industry is crucial for a leader to guide employees effectively.
superficial/suːpərˈfɪʃəl/adjectiveAppearing to be true or real only until examined more closely.表面的Good communication may be inspiring, but it can often be superficial and not translate into results.
tangible/ˈtan(d)ʒəb(ə)l/adjectivePerceptible by touch; clear and definite; real.有形的The leader's technical background led to tangible improvements in the company's performance.
implement/ˈɪmplɪmənt/verbPut (a decision, plan, agreement, etc.) into effect.实施The boss praised them without implementing any changes or providing clear guidance.
guidance/ˈɡʌɪdəns/nounAdvice or information aimed at resolving a problem or difficulty.指导Employees need clear guidance on the direction and content of their efforts.
evaluate/ɪˈvaljueɪt/verbForm an idea of the amount, number, or value of; assess.评估It is important to evaluate a leader's technical background and communication skills.
crucial/ˈkruːʃ(ə)l/adjectiveDecisive or critical, especially in the success or failure of something.至关重要As a leader, it is crucial to guide employees on how to work effectively.
industry/ˈɪndəstri/nounEconomic activity concerned with the processing of raw materials and manufacture of goods in factories.行业A strong technical background in a particular industry is essential for an effective business leader.
练习同类托福写作题 →

将打开 LingoLeap App 的写作题目列表,而不是本题。练习需要免费账号。AI 评分会消耗积分,但 Practice Test 1(PQ26-1)中的题目每天可免费评分 3 次。

学术讨论评分标准

托福学术讨论任务基于ETS官方评分标准进行评估。AI评估系统从多个维度分析每个回答。

相关性与贡献

回答是否针对问题并为讨论做出有意义的贡献?

语言运用

语法准确性、词汇丰富度和句式结构质量。

论述与支撑

观点是否充分展开,是否有具体例子和清晰推理支撑?

回答中的常见模式

基于对该题目用户提交内容的分析,以下是在学生回答中观察到的常见模式。

很多学生能清楚表达观点,但缺乏具体的论据支撑。

高分回答会直接引用阅读段落和其他发言者的观点。

更高分的回答使用多样化的句式结构和学术词汇。

时间管理是关键因素——匆忙完成的回答在论述发展方面得分较低。

学习建议

1

在开始写作前仔细阅读题目,理清问题的所有组成部分。

2

在回答中引用阅读段落和其他同学的观点。

3

使用具体例子来支持你的主要论点——避免笼统的表述。

4

目标字数120-150词。更长的回答不一定更好;清晰度和针对性更重要。

5

进行限时练习(10分钟),在考试条件下提升写作流畅度。

常见问题

什么是托福学术讨论任务?
托福学术讨论任务要求你参与在线课堂讨论。你需要阅读教授的问题和其他学生的回复,然后在约10分钟内写出自己的帖子,表达并支持你的观点。
学术讨论任务如何评分?
该任务按0-5分评分,评估维度包括与讨论的相关性、语言运用质量(语法、词汇、句式结构)以及你如何用具体例子和推理来发展和支持自己的观点。
本页面上的用户样本是什么?
这些是托福考生在LingoLeap上练习此题时提交的真实回答。每个样本都经过我们的AI评分引擎评估,提供分数和关于优势与待提升领域的详细反馈。
AI评估的准确度如何?
LingoLeap的AI评估引擎基于ETS官方评分标准训练,并与人工评分校准。虽然没有自动化系统是完美的,但它为练习目的提供了可靠的反馈,帮助识别具体的提升方向。
如何练习这道学术讨论题目?
你可以注册免费的LingoLeap账号进行练习。针对这道题目写出你自己的回答,提交后即可获得带有详细反馈的AI即时评估。
学术讨论回答应该多长?
目标字数120-150词。该任务给你10分钟写作时间。重点关注表达的清晰度、用具体例子支持观点以及引用讨论背景,而不是追求更长的篇幅。

今天就为您的目标分数加油!

与 LingoLeap,英语考试专家一起

更快达到您的理想分数

立即免费试用