TOEFL TPO -1 Academic Discussion Writing Sample: our professor is teaching a class on economy. Write a post responding to the professor’s question.
真实用户提交的答案,配合AI智能评估与反馈
共有 1 份用户提交的样本
开始免费练习题目概览
ProfessorToday, we will examine what economists call incentives-the motivations that lead people to make certain choices. Cost is a major category of economic incentives. People tend to change their behavior when a particular choice gets more expensive. Let's discuss an example. Some economists argue that a good way to reduce air pollution is for governments to raise the cost(through taxes or other means) of fuel for cars. Do you agree or disagree with this viewpoint?Why?
Student AI think it would be a good idea to raise fuel prices. Making it more expensive to drive cars would cause many people to choose public transportation or use bicycles instead. In my city, they've just added bicycle lanes to all of the major roads. So, it would be easy to give up driving.
Student BI disagree. Why should individuals be punished with such an added expense in their daily lives? The argument for a consumer fuel tax makes the assumption that cars are the biggest source of air pollution, and we need to question if that’s an accurate assumption.
用户样本与评估结果
用户样本
Nowdays, the air pollution problem is getting worse and worse. Some people may suggest that we should use raise the price of fuels to controll the use of private cars. In my opinion, it may do some good to the problem, however, it may cause more problems in our life. Firstly, we are so dependent on private vehicles to work and travel. Using public transportation will cost too much time for us sometimes. So it's not realistic for some people who are already tired out in their work and life. They may still prefer to use private cars in the end. Secondly, we cannot avoiding the problem of air pollution simply by rasing the price of fuel. Because many people may choose to pay the price to get more convenience. Last but not least, we still need to use private cars in many cases like when we have ergency and important things, and it is common for everyone to have this kind of situation sometimes. So I think we should focus on new cleaner energy fuel. In this way, we can solve the problem once and for all.
评估结果
1. 子项得分
-
Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.5
-
Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 4.0
-
Language Use and Grammar: 3.5
2. 预估分数
25. 3 任务完成度
整体来说,你的文章在回应教授的问题方面做得很好。然而,有一些方面可以改进。首先,在表达观点时,可以提供更多具体的例子和细节来支持你的看法。其次,在语言使用和语法方面,有一些小错误需要注意。
英文改进示例:
-
Instead of "it may do some good to the problem," consider writing "it may partially address the problem."
-
Instead of "we cannot avoiding the problem," consider writing "we cannot avoid the problem."
4. 文章结构与组织
从文章结构和组织的角度来看,你的文章整体上是清晰易懂的。然而,有一些建议可以帮助你进一步改进文章。首先,在引言部分,可以更明确地表达自己的观点。其次,在正文段落中,尝试使用更多的过渡词汇和短语来连接不同观点。
英文改进示例:
-
在引言部分,可以写:“In my opinion, raising fuel prices might have some positive effects on reducing air pollution, but it could also lead to other issues in our daily lives.”
-
在正文段落中使用过渡词汇,例如:“Firstly, we are heavily reliant on private vehicles for work and travel. However, using public transportation can be time-consuming and inconvenient for some people.”
5. 语法批改
NowdaysNowadays(misspelling), the air pollution problem is getting worse and worse. Some people may suggest that we should use raise the price of fuels to controllcontrol(misspelling) the use of private cars. In my opinion, it may do some good to the problem, however, it may cause more problems in our life.
Firstly, we are so dependent on private vehicles to work and travel. Using public transportation will cost too much time for us sometimes. So it's not realistic for some people who are already tired out (Two consecutive spaces)in their work and life. They may still prefer to use private cars in the end.
Secondly, we cannot avoidingavoid(Non-infinitive verb after modal verbs) the problem of air pollution simply by rasingracing(misspelling) the price of (Two consecutive spaces)fuel. Because many people may choose to pay the price to get more convenience.
Last but not least, we still need to use private cars in many cases like when we have ergencyregency(misspelling) and important things, and it is common for everyone to have this kind of situation sometimes. So I think we should focus on new cleaner energy fuel. In this way, we can solve the problem once and for all.
Title: 6 文章修订
Nowadays, the issue of air pollution is becoming increasingly severe. Some individuals propose raising fuel prices to control private car usage. While this approach may have some benefits, I believe it could lead to additional problems in our daily lives.
Firstly, many people rely heavily on private vehicles for work and travel. Utilizing public transportation can be time-consuming and may not be a feasible option for those with demanding schedules. Consequently, these individuals might continue to use their cars despite the increased cost.
Secondly, simply raising fuel prices may not effectively address air pollution since numerous people might still choose to pay the higher price for the sake of convenience. Thus, this measure alone would not guarantee a significant reduction in private car usage or emissions.
Lastly, there are situations where using a private car is essential, such as emergencies or important events. It is unrealistic to expect people to completely abandon their vehicles under such circumstances. Instead of focusing solely on raising fuel prices, efforts should be directed towards developing cleaner energy sources and promoting their adoption. This approach would provide a more comprehensive and long-lasting solution to the problem of air pollution. (197 words)
Nowdays, the Nowadays, the issue of air pollution problem is getting worse and worse. becoming increasingly severe (changed "worse and worse" to "increasingly severe" for a more formal tone). Some people individuals propose raising fuel prices to control private car usage (corrected "raise the price of fuels to controll the use of private cars" for clarity and grammar). While this approach may suggest that we should use raise the price of fuels to controll the use of private cars. In my opinion, have some benefits, I believe it may do some good to the problem, however, it may cause more could lead to additional problems in our life. daily lives.
Firstly, we many people rely heavily on private vehicles for work and travel (rephrased "we are so dependent on private vehicles to work and travel. Using travel" for clarity). Utilizing public transportation can be time-consuming and may not be a feasible option for those with demanding schedules (rephrased "Using public transportation will cost too much time for us sometimes. So it's not realistic for some people who are already tired out in sometimes" for clarity). Consequently, these individuals might continue to use their work and life. They may still prefer to use private cars in the end. despite the increased cost.
Secondly, we simply raising fuel prices may not effectively address air pollution since numerous people might still choose to pay the higher price for the sake of convenience (rephrased "we cannot avoiding the problem of air pollution simply by rasing the price of fuel. Because many people may choose to pay the price to get more convenience. convenience" for clarity and grammar). Thus, this measure alone would not guarantee a significant reduction in private car usage or emissions.
Last but not least, we Lastly, there are situations where using a private car is essential, such as emergencies or important events (rephrased "we still need to use private cars in many cases like when we have ergency and important things, and it things" for clarity and grammar). It is common for everyone to have this kind of situation sometimes. So unrealistic to expect people to completely abandon their vehicles under such circumstances. Instead of focusing solely on raising fuel prices, efforts should be directed towards developing cleaner energy sources and promoting their adoption (rephrased "So I think we should focus on new cleaner energy fuel. In this way, we can solve the problem once and for all.all" for clarity). This approach would provide a more comprehensive and long-lasting solution to the problem of air pollution.
Display title: 8 思维导图
1. Introduction
- Air pollution issue
- Raising fuel prices proposal
- Potential problems
2. Reliance on private vehicles
- Work and travel
- Inconvenience of public transportation
- Time-consuming
3. Ineffectiveness of raising fuel prices
- People still choose convenience
- No guarantee of reduced car usage or emissions
4. Essential situations for private cars
- Emergencies
- Important events
5. Alternative solutions
- Cleaner energy sources development
- Promoting adoption
6. Conclusion
- Comprehensive and long-lasting solution needed for air pollution problem
Display title: 9 关键词
| Word | Phonetic Symbol | Part of Speech | English definition | Simplified Chinese translation | Sample sentences |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Severe | /sɪˈvɪr/ | Adjective | Extremely bad or serious | 严重的 | The issue of air pollution is becoming increasingly severe. |
| Feasible | /ˈfiːzəbl/ | Adjective | Possible to do easily or conveniently | 可行的 | Public transportation may not be a feasible option for those with busy schedules. |
| Consequently | /ˈkɒnsɪkwəntli/ | Adverb | As a result | 因此 | Consequently, these individuals might continue to use their cars despite the increased cost. |
| Guarantee | /ˌɡærənˈti:/ | /Noun, Verb | /A formal assurance; to ensure | /保证;确保 | /This measure alone would not guarantee a significant reduction in private car usage or emissions. |
| Essential | /ɪˈsenʃəl/ | Adjective | Absolutely necessary | 必要的 | It is unrealistic to expect people to completely abandon their vehicles under such essential circumstances. |
| Unrealistic | /ˌʌnrɪəˈlɪstɪk/ | /Adjective | /Not compatible with reality | /不切实际的 | /It is unrealistic to expect people to completely abandon their vehicles under such circumstances. |
| Solely | /ˈsəʊlli/ | Adverb | Only, exclusively | 仅仅 | Instead of focusing solely on raising fuel prices, efforts should be directed towards developing cleaner energy sources. |
| Comprehensive | /ˌkɒmprɪˈhensɪv/ | /Adjective | /Including all or nearly all elements | /全面的 | /This approach would provide a more comprehensive and long-lasting solution to the problem of air pollution. |
| Long-lasting | /lɒŋ ˈlæstɪŋ/ | /Adjective | /Continuing for a long period of time | /持久的 | /This approach would provide a more comprehensive and long-lasting solution to the problem of air pollution. |
学术讨论评分标准
托福学术讨论任务基于ETS官方评分标准进行评估。AI评估系统从多个维度分析每个回答。
相关性与贡献
回答是否针对问题并为讨论做出有意义的贡献?
语言运用
语法准确性、词汇丰富度和句式结构质量。
论述与支撑
观点是否充分展开,是否有具体例子和清晰推理支撑?
回答中的常见模式
基于对该题目用户提交内容的分析,以下是在学生回答中观察到的常见模式。
很多学生能清楚表达观点,但缺乏具体的论据支撑。
高分回答会直接引用阅读段落和其他发言者的观点。
更高分的回答使用多样化的句式结构和学术词汇。
时间管理是关键因素——匆忙完成的回答在论述发展方面得分较低。
学习建议
在开始写作前仔细阅读题目,理清问题的所有组成部分。
在回答中引用阅读段落和其他同学的观点。
使用具体例子来支持你的主要论点——避免笼统的表述。
目标字数120-150词。更长的回答不一定更好;清晰度和针对性更重要。
进行限时练习(10分钟),在考试条件下提升写作流畅度。
常见问题
什么是托福学术讨论任务?
学术讨论任务如何评分?
本页面上的用户样本是什么?
AI评估的准确度如何?
如何练习这道学术讨论题目?
学术讨论回答应该多长?
相关托福学术讨论题目
All TOEFL Writing Samples
Browse all user-submitted TOEFL writing samples with AI evaluation
TOEFL Academic Discussion Guide
Learn strategies and tips for the Academic Discussion writing task
TOEFL Writing Guide
Complete guide to all TOEFL writing task types and scoring
TOEFL Speaking Guide
Master all TOEFL speaking tasks with expert strategies
TOEFL Reading Guide
Strategies for TOEFL reading comprehension tasks
TOEFL Listening Guide
Tips and practice for TOEFL listening comprehension