TOEFLIELTS
☰
All Samples

TOEFL Academic Discussion Writing Sample: Your professor is teaching a class on political science. Write a post responding to the professor' s question.

真实用户提交的答案,配合AI智能评估与反馈

共有 1 份用户提交的样本

开始免费练习

题目概览

Professor

Today we' re going to discuss whether the government should tax unhealthy products, such as sugary drinks and junk food. On one hand, taxing these products could discourage people from consuming them and reduce health problems. On the other hand, some argue that such taxes unfairly target lower-income families who may rely on these products as affordable sources of food. If you had to choose, would you support or oppose taxing unhealthy products? Why?

Sam

I support the idea of taxing unhealthy products. These products are often high in sugar, salt, and fat, which can lead to serious health problems such as obesity, diabetes, and heart disease. As you said, by taxing these products, the government can discourage people from consuming them and resolve some of these health issues. Moreover, the revenue generated can be used to fund advertising campaigns that promote healthy eating habits.

Tanya

I believe that such taxes are unfair to families that don' it have a lot of money. Wealthy people will not care about the taxes and their habits won' t change. Additionally, when prices go up, people usually try to save money by purchasing lower-quality products that are cheaper to begin with. If people start buying low-quality food they could suffer even more health problems. There are better solutions to this problem than taxes.

用户样本与评估结果

练习同类托福写作题 →

将打开 LingoLeap App 的写作题目列表,而不是本题。练习需要免费账号。AI 评分会消耗积分,但 Practice Test 1(PQ26-1)中的题目每天可免费评分 3 次。

1

用户样本 #1

I concur with Sam's viewpoint that the government should tax unhealthy products. Although it will have some effects on the low-income families, health...

分数
25

用户样本

I concur with Sam's viewpoint that the government should tax unhealthy products. Although it will have some effects on the low-income families, healthy is the most essential issue for everyone including people who in low-income. For example, if a family that do not have a lot of money buys some unhealthy food, they may experience hard time to care for their unhealthy body caused by eating the bad food. Also, the healing time will spend a multitude of money that the family cannot afford it. If the government want to support these poor families, they can initiative some charities and offer some free food and public service for them. That will be more fair for the society. All in all, I support that it is necessary for the government to tax unhealthy products.

评估结果

1. 子项得分

  • Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.5

  • Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 4.0

  • Language Use and Grammar: 3.5

2. 预估分数

25. 3 任务完成度

这篇文章基本上满足了任务要求,表达了作者对政府征收不健康产品税的支持,并给出了一些理由。但是,文章在语言和语法方面还有一些不足,需要改进。建议在以下方面进行改进:1)使用更准确的词汇和表达;2)注意语法错误和拼写错误;3)尝试使用更多的句型和词汇,使文章更丰富。

Example 1: Original: "Although it will have some effects on the low-income families, healthy is the most essential issue for everyone including people who in low-income." Improved: "Although it may have some impact on low-income families, health is the most crucial concern for everyone, including those with low incomes."

Example 2: Original: "If the government want to support these poor families, they can initiative some charities and offer some free food and public service for them." Improved: "If the government wants to support these impoverished families, they can initiate charitable programs and provide free food and public services for them."

4. 文章结构与组织

文章的结构和组织方面基本合理,包括引言、正文和结论。但是,在逻辑性和段落之间的过渡方面还有待提高。建议在以下方面进行改进:1)在段落之间添加过渡词或短语,使文章更连贯;2)确保每个段落都有一个明确的主题句,以便读者更容易理解文章的结构。

Example 1: Original: "For example, if a family that do not have a lot of money buys some unhealthy food, they may experience hard time to care for their unhealthy body caused by eating the bad food." Improved: "For instance, when a financially struggling family purchases unhealthy food, they may face difficulties in managing health issues resulting from consuming such low-quality products."

Example 2: Original: "All in all, I support that it is necessary for the government to tax unhealthy products." Improved: "In conclusion, I firmly believe that it is essential for the government to impose taxes on unhealthy products to promote public health and create a more equitable society."

5. 语法批改

I concuragree with Sam's viewpoint that the government should tax unhealthy products. Although it will have some effects on the low-income families, healthyhealth is the most essential issue for everyoneeveryone, including people whothose in low-income.low-income brackets. For example, if a family that do notdoesn't have a lot of money buys some unhealthy food, they may experience hard time to caredifficulties in caring for their unhealthy body causedbodies, which may be weakened by eating the badunhealthy food. Also,Additionally, the healing time will spendprocess may require a multitudesignificant amount of money that the family cannot afford it.afford. If the government wantwants to support these poorlow-income families, they can initiative someinitiate charities and offer some free food and public service for them.services. That willwould be more fair for the society. All in all,In conclusion, I support that it is necessary for the government to tax unhealthy products.

Section Title: 6 Article Revision

I agree with Sam's perspective that the government should impose taxes on unhealthy products. Although this may impact low-income families, health is a paramount concern for everyone, including those with limited financial resources. For instance, if a family with limited means consumes unhealthy food, they may face difficulties in addressing the health issues arising from their poor dietary choices. Moreover, treating these health problems can be costly and potentially unaffordable for such families. Instead of relying on unhealthy products as affordable food sources, the government could establish charities and provide free food and public services to support these families. This approach would promote fairness within society while prioritizing health. Therefore, I firmly believe that taxing unhealthy products is a necessary measure for the government to take. (131 words)

I concur agree with Sam's viewpoint perspective (changed "concur" to "agree" for a more natural tone) that the government should tax impose taxes (changed "tax" to "impose taxes" for clarity) on unhealthy products. Although it will this may impact (changed "will have some effects on the on" to "may impact" for conciseness and a more natural tone) low-income families, healthy health is a paramount concern (changed "healthy is the most essential issue for everyone issue" to "health is a paramount concern" for better word choice and grammar) for everyone, including people those with limited financial resources (changed "people who in low-income. low-income" to "those with limited financial resources" for better grammar and clarity). For example, instance, if a family that with limited means (changed "that do not have a lot of money buys some money" to "with limited means" for conciseness and clarity) consumes unhealthy food, they may experience hard time to care for face difficulties in addressing the health issues arising from their unhealthy body caused by eating the bad food. Also, the healing time will spend a multitude poor dietary choices (rephrased sentence for better grammar and clarity). Moreover, treating these health problems can be costly and potentially unaffordable for such families. Instead of money that the family cannot afford it. If relying on unhealthy products as affordable food sources, the government want could establish charities and provide free food and public services to support these poor families, they can initiative some charities and offer some free food and public service for them. That will be more fair for the society. All in all, families. This approach would promote fairness within society while prioritizing health. Therefore, I support firmly believe that it is taxing unhealthy products is a necessary measure (changed "it is necessary" to "a necessary measure" for better word choice) for the government to tax unhealthy products.take.

Title: 8 思维导图


1. Introduction
   - Agree with Sam's perspective
   - Importance of health for everyone

2. Impact on low-income families
   - Unhealthy food consumption consequences
   - Costly treatments for health issues

3. Government actions
   - Establish charities
   - Provide free food and public services

4. Promoting fairness and prioritizing health

5. Conclusion
   - Taxing unhealthy products is necessary

Title: 9 关键词

WordPhonetic SymbolPart of SpeechEnglish DefinitionSimplified Chinese TranslationSample Sentence
perspective/pərˈspektɪv/nouna particular attitude or way of considering things观点I agree with Sam's perspective that the government should impose taxes on unhealthy products.
paramount/ˈpærəmaʊnt/adjectivemore important than anything else至关重要的Health is a paramount concern for everyone, including those with limited financial resources.
consequences/ˈkɒnsɪkwəns/nouna result or effect of an action or condition后果They may face difficulties in addressing the health issues arising from their poor dietary choices.
unaffordable/ʌnəˈfɔːrdəbl/adjectivetoo expensive for people to be able to buy无法承受的- Treating these health problems can be costly and potentially unaffordable for such families.
rely/rɪˈlaɪ/verbto depend on with full trust or confidence依赖Instead of relying on unhealthy products as affordable food sources, the government could take action.
establish/ɪˈstæblɪʃ/verbto set up or create建立- The government could establish charities and provide free food and public services to support families.
fairness/ˈfeərnəs/nounthe quality of treating people equally公平- This approach would promote fairness within society while prioritizing health.
measure/ˈmeʒər/nounan action taken to achieve a particular purpose措施- Taxing unhealthy products is a necessary measure for the government to take.
prioritize/praɪˈɒrətaɪz/verb-to decide which of a group of things are most important so that you can deal with them first.优先考虑- This approach would promote fairness within society while prioritizing health.
练习同类托福写作题 →

将打开 LingoLeap App 的写作题目列表,而不是本题。练习需要免费账号。AI 评分会消耗积分,但 Practice Test 1(PQ26-1)中的题目每天可免费评分 3 次。

学术讨论评分标准

托福学术讨论任务基于ETS官方评分标准进行评估。AI评估系统从多个维度分析每个回答。

相关性与贡献

回答是否针对问题并为讨论做出有意义的贡献?

语言运用

语法准确性、词汇丰富度和句式结构质量。

论述与支撑

观点是否充分展开,是否有具体例子和清晰推理支撑?

回答中的常见模式

基于对该题目用户提交内容的分析,以下是在学生回答中观察到的常见模式。

很多学生能清楚表达观点,但缺乏具体的论据支撑。

高分回答会直接引用阅读段落和其他发言者的观点。

更高分的回答使用多样化的句式结构和学术词汇。

时间管理是关键因素——匆忙完成的回答在论述发展方面得分较低。

学习建议

1

在开始写作前仔细阅读题目,理清问题的所有组成部分。

2

在回答中引用阅读段落和其他同学的观点。

3

使用具体例子来支持你的主要论点——避免笼统的表述。

4

目标字数120-150词。更长的回答不一定更好;清晰度和针对性更重要。

5

进行限时练习(10分钟),在考试条件下提升写作流畅度。

常见问题

什么是托福学术讨论任务?
托福学术讨论任务要求你参与在线课堂讨论。你需要阅读教授的问题和其他学生的回复,然后在约10分钟内写出自己的帖子,表达并支持你的观点。
学术讨论任务如何评分?
该任务按0-5分评分,评估维度包括与讨论的相关性、语言运用质量(语法、词汇、句式结构)以及你如何用具体例子和推理来发展和支持自己的观点。
本页面上的用户样本是什么?
这些是托福考生在LingoLeap上练习此题时提交的真实回答。每个样本都经过我们的AI评分引擎评估,提供分数和关于优势与待提升领域的详细反馈。
AI评估的准确度如何?
LingoLeap的AI评估引擎基于ETS官方评分标准训练,并与人工评分校准。虽然没有自动化系统是完美的,但它为练习目的提供了可靠的反馈,帮助识别具体的提升方向。
如何练习这道学术讨论题目?
你可以注册免费的LingoLeap账号进行练习。针对这道题目写出你自己的回答,提交后即可获得带有详细反馈的AI即时评估。
学术讨论回答应该多长?
目标字数120-150词。该任务给你10分钟写作时间。重点关注表达的清晰度、用具体例子支持观点以及引用讨论背景,而不是追求更长的篇幅。

今天就为您的目标分数加油!

与 LingoLeap,英语考试专家一起

更快达到您的理想分数

立即免费试用