TOEFL TPO -1 Academic Discussion Writing Sample: Your professor is teaching a class on education. Write a post responding to the professor’s question. In your response you should: l express and support your opinion l make a contribution to the discussion An effective response will contain at least 100 words. You will have 10 minutes to write it. Owing to the fast development of urbanization, a huge amount of people flushing into the city makes the city traffic become increasingly crowded, which makes it urgent for our government to improve transportation system. Should a government prioritize investing public transport system or facilitate people own and use private vehicles?
真实用户提交的答案,配合AI智能评估与反馈
共有 2 份用户提交的样本
开始免费练习题目概览
Professor
Owing to the fast development of urbanization, a huge amount of people flushing into the city makes the city traffic become increasingly crowded, which makes it urgent for our government to improve transportation system. Should a government prioritize investing public transport system or facilitate people own and use private vehicles?
Paul
I think government should give a priority to developing public transit system in order to solve traffic problems. Modernizing trains and buses, lowering ticket prices (fares), and expanding public transportation routes will help relieve the traffic jams on the road.
Claire
Helping people own and use private vehicles, such as cars, by offering low-interest loans, keeping gasoline prices low, and building better roads,is an efficient way to alleviate crowded public transports. Thus, by private cars, people can enjoy a more comfortable and convenient travel, especially for those who live in a remote area, without having to chock in the crowded carriage for a long time.
用户样本与评估结果
用户样本
I consider the reinforcement of the public transportation system can be a wiser choice. Claire oversees the inescapable fact that the overuse of private vehicles will also be a factor oftraffic jams in the city, which will in turn make the situation much worse. In addition to Paul’s statement, prioritizing public transportation will be more effective because not only buses but also undergrounds can help many people to commute in one trip, in which case the number of vehicles on the city road will decrease undoubtedly. To illustrate, almost everybody in my company need to commute to our company. In the past, most of us drove our own cars to work, but there was always someone being late for work because of the crowded roads, which were full of private cars since each car can only carry less than five people most of the time. Fortunately, things have changed since improvements made by our local government on the public transportation. Consequently, there is no need for everybody to drive their own cars on the road every day, and they can take buses instead.
评估结果
1. 子项得分
-
Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.5
-
Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 4.0
-
Language Use and Grammar: 4.0
2. 预估分数
- 25
3. 任务完成度
整体来说,你的文章回答了问题并表达了观点。但是,为了更好地完成任务,建议在文章中加入更多具体的例子和细节来支持你的观点。此外,可以尝试讨论一下促进私人汽车使用的优缺点,以便更全面地回答问题。
示例1:你可以详细说明公共交通系统优先发展带来的环境效益,如减少空气污染和碳排放。 示例2:你可以讨论一下私人汽车使用增加可能导致的道路拥堵和停车难题。
4. 文章结构与组织
文章结构基本清晰,包括引言、正文和结论。然而,在段落之间加入过渡句子会使文章更连贯。此外,在正文部分中使用主题句来明确每个段落的重点也是一个很好的做法。
建议1:在引言部分简要介绍两种观点,并明确表达自己的立场。 建议2:在正文部分开头使用主题句,如:“首先,公共交通系统的优先发展可以有效减少城市道路上的车辆数量。”
5. 语法批改
I consider the reinforcement of the public transportation system can be a wiser choice.
Claire oversees the inescapable fact that the overuse of private vehicles will also be a factor oftrafficof traffic(misspelling) jams in the city, which will in turn make the situation much worse. In addition to Paul’s statement, prioritizing public transportation will be more effective because not only buses but also undergrounds can help many people to commute in one trip, in which case the number of vehicles on the city road will decrease undoubtedly. To illustrate, almost everybody in my company need to commute to our company. In the past, most of us drove our own cars to work, but there was always someone being late for work because of the crowded roads, which were full of private cars since each car can only carry less than five people most of the time. Fortunately, things have changed since improvements made by our local government on the public transportation. Consequently, there is no need for everybody to drive their own cars on the road every day, and they can take buses instead.
Title: 6 文章修订
In my opinion, strengthening the public transportation system is a more prudent approach to addressing urban traffic congestion. Claire's suggestion of promoting private vehicle ownership overlooks the inevitable consequence that an increase in private vehicles will exacerbate traffic jams in cities. As Paul mentioned, prioritizing public transportation would be more effective because buses and subways can accommodate a larger number of commuters in a single trip, consequently reducing the volume of vehicles on city roads.
For instance, nearly everyone at my company commutes to work daily. Previously, most employees drove their own cars, often resulting in tardiness due to congested roads filled with private vehicles that typically carry fewer than five passengers. However, our local government's improvements to public transportation have significantly altered this situation. Now, employees no longer need to rely solely on their personal vehicles for daily commutes and can opt for buses instead. This shift has undoubtedly alleviated traffic congestion and improved overall commuting experiences for urban dwellers. (164 words)
I consider the reinforcement of In my opinion, strengthening the public transportation system can be is a wiser choice. ¶ Claire oversees more prudent approach (revised for clarity and formality) to addressing urban traffic congestion. Claire's suggestion of promoting private vehicle ownership overlooks the inescapable fact inevitable consequence (rephrased for clarity) that the overuse of an increase in private vehicles will also be a factor oftraffic exacerbate traffic jams in the city, which will in turn make the situation much worse. In addition to Paul’s statement, cities. As Paul mentioned, prioritizing public transportation will would be more effective because not only buses but also undergrounds and subways can help many people to commute in one trip, in which case the accommodate a larger number of commuters in a single trip (rephrased for conciseness), consequently reducing the volume of vehicles on the city road will decrease undoubtedly. To illustrate, almost everybody in roads.
For instance, nearly everyone at my company need to commute to our company. In the past, commutes to work daily. Previously, most of us employees drove our their own cars to work, but there was always someone being late for work because of the crowded roads, which were full of cars, often resulting in tardiness due to congested roads filled with private cars since each car can only vehicles that typically carry less fewer than five people most of the time. Fortunately, things have changed since improvements made by passengers (rephrased for clarity). However, our local government government's improvements to public transportation have significantly altered this situation (revised for conciseness). Now, employees no longer need to rely solely on the public transportation. Consequently, there is no need for everybody to drive their own cars on the road every day, and they personal vehicles for daily commutes and can take opt for buses instead.instead (rephrased for clarity). This shift has undoubtedly alleviated traffic congestion and improved overall commuting experiences for urban dwellers (revised for conciseness).
8 思维导图
- Strengthening Public Transportation
- Addressing Urban Traffic Congestion
- More Prudent Approach
- Reducing Volume of Vehicles on City Roads
- Claire's Suggestion: Promoting Private Vehicle Ownership
- Exacerbate Traffic Jams in Cities
- Paul's Opinion: Prioritizing Public Transportation
- Buses and Subways Accommodate Larger Number of Commuters
- Example: Company Commutes
- Previous Situation: Employees Driving Own Cars
- Tardiness Due to Congested Roads with Private Vehicles
- Local Government Improvements to Public Transportation
- Employees Can Opt for Buses Instead of Personal Vehicles
- Alleviated Traffic Congestion and Improved Commuting Experiences for Urban Dwellers
9 关键词
| Word | Phonetic Symbol | Part of Speech | English Definition | Simplified Chinese Translation | Sample Sentence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| prudent | /ˈpruːdənt/ | adjective | acting with or showing care and thought for the future | 审慎的 | Strengthening the public transportation system is a more prudent approach to addressing traffic congestion. |
| exacerbate | /ɪɡˈzæsərbeɪt/ | verb | make (a problem, bad situation, or negative feeling) worse | 加剧 | An increase in private vehicles will exacerbate traffic jams in cities. |
| accommodate | /əˈkɒmədeɪt/ | verb | provide lodging or sufficient space for | 容纳 | Buses and subways can accommodate a larger number of commuters in a single trip. |
| tardiness | /ˈtɑːrdɪnəs/ | noun | the quality or fact of being late | 拖延 | Employees often experienced tardiness due to congested roads filled with private vehicles. |
| congested | /kənˈdʒestɪd/ | adjective | (of a road or place) so crowded with traffic or people as to hinder or prevent freedom of movement | 拥挤的 | The roads were congested with private vehicles that typically carry fewer than five passengers. |
| alleviate | /əˈliːvi.eɪt/ | verb | make (suffering, deficiency, or a problem) less severe | 减轻 | This shift has undoubtedly alleviated traffic congestion and improved overall commuting experiences. |
| dweller | /ˈdwelər/ | noun | a person who lives in a particular place | 居民 | Improved commuting experiences for urban dwellers. |
| solely | /ˈsoʊlli/ | adverb | not involving anyone or anything else; only | 仅仅 | Employees no longer need to rely solely on their personal vehicles for daily commutes. |
| opt | /ɒpt/ | verb | make a choice from a range of possibilities | 选择 | Employees can now opt for buses instead of personal vehicles. |
| undoubtedly | /ʌnˈdaʊtɪdli/ | adverb | without doubt; certainly | 毫无疑问地 | This shift has undoubtedly alleviated traffic congestion and improved overall commuting experiences. |
学术讨论评分标准
托福学术讨论任务基于ETS官方评分标准进行评估。AI评估系统从多个维度分析每个回答。
相关性与贡献
回答是否针对问题并为讨论做出有意义的贡献?
语言运用
语法准确性、词汇丰富度和句式结构质量。
论述与支撑
观点是否充分展开,是否有具体例子和清晰推理支撑?
回答中的常见模式
基于对该题目用户提交内容的分析,以下是在学生回答中观察到的常见模式。
很多学生能清楚表达观点,但缺乏具体的论据支撑。
高分回答会直接引用阅读段落和其他发言者的观点。
更高分的回答使用多样化的句式结构和学术词汇。
时间管理是关键因素——匆忙完成的回答在论述发展方面得分较低。
学习建议
在开始写作前仔细阅读题目,理清问题的所有组成部分。
在回答中引用阅读段落和其他同学的观点。
使用具体例子来支持你的主要论点——避免笼统的表述。
目标字数120-150词。更长的回答不一定更好;清晰度和针对性更重要。
进行限时练习(10分钟),在考试条件下提升写作流畅度。
常见问题
什么是托福学术讨论任务?
学术讨论任务如何评分?
本页面上的用户样本是什么?
AI评估的准确度如何?
如何练习这道学术讨论题目?
学术讨论回答应该多长?
相关托福学术讨论题目
All TOEFL Writing Samples
Browse all user-submitted TOEFL writing samples with AI evaluation
TOEFL Academic Discussion Guide
Learn strategies and tips for the Academic Discussion writing task
TOEFL Writing Guide
Complete guide to all TOEFL writing task types and scoring
TOEFL Speaking Guide
Master all TOEFL speaking tasks with expert strategies
TOEFL Reading Guide
Strategies for TOEFL reading comprehension tasks
TOEFL Listening Guide
Tips and practice for TOEFL listening comprehension