TOEFL TPO -1 Academic Discussion Writing Sample: Which approach do you think is better: Givingrades based only on performance, or gradingstudents not just on performance but also onheir effort?
真实用户提交的答案,配合AI智能评估与反馈
共有 1 份用户提交的样本
开始免费练习题目概览
Professor
This week, I want you to discuss assessmentriteria. Some schoolteachers give high gradesmarks) only to those students who perform wellon their homework assignments and tests. Othereachers, however, may give high grades tostudents who have worked very hard on theirassignments but have not performed so well.Which approach do you think is better: Givingrades based only on performance, or gradingstudents not just on performance but also onheir effort?
Kelly
I think grades should be based on performance only.It'sa matter of fairness. l'd be really upset if another student got nearly the same grade that I did when I turned in work that was almost perfect and the other student's work had incorrect answers or unclear ideas. It wouldn't matter to me if they worked harder.
Paul
Sure, evaluation should mainly be based upon the student'sperformance, but hard work should count for something. Astudent who works hard, even when the final grade isn't thehighest in the class, builds character, which will benefit thestudent later in life when they go to university or apply for ajob.
用户样本与评估结果
用户样本
In discussing assessment criteria that teachers giving to students, Paul advocates that hard work should also count for students’ grade, not just performence. Admittedly, this arrpoach has some merits, I find myself agreeing with Kelly’s suggestion that grades should be based on performence only. In my view, this approach provides a relatively fair environment to evaluatie students’ achievement in academic work. Specifically, it not only helps to indentify students’ perfoemence efficiently, but also fosters a healthy competive atmosphere among students. Moreover, these factors serve as powerful incentives for students to work harder and contribute significantly to long-term individual development. Therefore, I firmly believe that grades should be the only form to evaluate students’ performence.
评估结果
1. Sub Scores
Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.0 Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 3.5 Language Use and Grammar: 3.5
2. Estimated Scores
Estimated Score: 22 (3.5)
3. Task completeness
The essay addresses the specific requirements of the task by discussing both Kelly's and Paul's viewpoints on grading students based on performance or effort. However, the essay could be improved by providing more detailed examples or explanations to support the chosen viewpoint. Additionally, some sentences are difficult to understand due to grammar errors or unclear language use.
Example 1: Original: "Specifically, it not only helps to indentify students’ perfoemence efficiently, but also fosters a healthy competive atmosphere among students." Improved: "Specifically, it not only helps to identify students' performance efficiently but also fosters a healthy competitive atmosphere among students."
Example 2: Original: "Therefore, I firmly believe that grades should be the only form to evaluate students’ performence." Improved: "Therefore, I firmly believe that grades should be based solely on students' performance."
4. Essay structure and organization
The essay has a clear structure with an introduction, body, and conclusion. However, the organization could be improved by focusing each paragraph on a specific point with supporting details and using clear transitions between ideas and paragraphs.
Example 1: Original: "In my view, this approach provides a relatively fair environment to evaluatie students’ achievement in academic work." Improved: "In my view, basing grades solely on performance provides a relatively fair environment for evaluating students' achievements in academic work."
Example 2: Original: "Moreover, these factors serve as powerful incentives for students to work harder and contribute significantly to long-term individual development." Improved: "Moreover, focusing on performance as the primary grading criterion serves as a powerful incentive for students to work harder, ultimately contributing to their long-term individual development."
5. Grammar
In discussing assessment criteria that teachers giving to students, Paul advocates that hard work should also count for students’ grade, not just performenceperformance(misspelling). Admittedly, this arrpoacharr poach(misspelling) has some merits, I find myself agreeing with Kelly’s suggestion that grades should be based on performenceperformance(misspelling) only. In my view, this approach provides a relatively fair environment to evaluatieevaluate(misspelling) students’ achievement in academic work. Specifically, it not only helps to indentifyidentify(misspelling) students’ perfoemenceperformance(misspelling) efficiently, but also fosters a healthy competivecompete(misspelling) atmosphere among students. Moreover, these factors serve as powerful incentives for students to work harder and contribute significantly to long-term individual development. Therefore, I firmly believe that grades should be the only form to evaluate students’ performenceperformance(misspelling).
Display title: 6 Revised Essay
In the debate over assessment criteria, Paul contends that hard work should factor into a student's grade alongside performance. While this approach has its merits, I concur with Kelly's assertion that grades should be based solely on performance. In my opinion, this method offers a fairer environment for evaluating students' academic achievements. Specifically, it not only efficiently identifies students' performance levels but also fosters a healthy competitive atmosphere among them. Furthermore, these factors serve as potent motivators for students to work harder and contribute significantly to their long-term individual development. Consequently, I am steadfast in my belief that grades should be the exclusive means of assessing student performance. (113 words)
In discussing the debate over assessment criteria that teachers giving to students, (revised for clarity and conciseness), Paul advocates contends that hard work should also count factor into a student's grade alongside performance (rephrased for students’ grade, not just performence. Admittedly, better flow). While this arrpoach approach has some merits, its merits (corrected spelling), I find myself agreeing concur with Kelly’s suggestion Kelly's assertion that grades should be based solely on performence only. performance (clarified meaning). In my view, opinion, this approach provides method offers a relatively fair fairer environment to evaluatie students’ achievement in for evaluating students' academic work. achievements (rephrased for better flow). Specifically, it not only helps to indentify students’ perfoemence efficiently, efficiently identifies students' performance levels (corrected spelling) but also fosters a healthy competive competitive atmosphere among students. Moreover, them (improved readability). Furthermore, these factors serve as powerful incentives potent motivators (more precise word choice) for students to work harder and contribute significantly to their long-term individual development. Therefore, development (enhanced clarity). Consequently, I firmly believe am steadfast in my belief that grades should be the only form to evaluate students’ performence.exclusive means of assessing student performance (emphasized the main point).
8 Mind Map
- Assessment Criteria Debate
- Paul's Argument
- Hard work as a factor
- Alongside performance
- Kelly's Assertion
- Grades based on performance only
- Author's Opinion
- Agree with Kelly
- Fairer evaluation method
- Efficiently identifies performance levels
- Fosters healthy competition
- Potent motivators for hard work
- Contributes to long-term development
9 Key Words
| Word | Phonetic Symbol | Part of Speech | English Definition | English Translation | Sample Sentences |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assessment | əˈsesmənt | Noun | The act of evaluating or appraising something or someone. | The evaluation of a student's academic progress. | Assessment criteria should be fair and transparent. |
| Contend | kənˈtend | Verb | To assert or maintain a position in an argument or debate. | To argue in favor of a particular point of view. | Paul contends that hard work should factor into grades. |
| Merit | ˈmerɪt | Noun | The quality of being particularly good or worthy, especially so as to deserve praise or reward. | A positive quality deserving recognition. | This approach has its merits, but it is not perfect. |
| Concur | kənˈkɜr | Verb | To agree; to have the same opinion as someone else. | To share the same viewpoint. | I concur with Kelly's assertion about grading policies. |
| Performance | pərˈfɔrməns | Noun | string>A measure of how well someone does a task or activity. | How well a student does in their academic work. | Grades should be based solely on performance. |
| Efficiently | ɪˈfɪʃəntli | Adverb | In a way that achieves maximum productivity with minimum wasted effort or expense. | Effectively and without waste. | The method efficiently identifies students' performance levels. |
| Fosters | ˈfɒstər | Verb | To encourage or promote the development of something, typically something regarded as good. | To nurture or support growth. | The system fosters a healthy competitive atmosphere among students. |
| Motivators | ˈmoʊtɪveɪtər | Noun | string>Something that provides a reason or stimulus for someone to do something. | Factors that encourage action. | These factors serve as potent motivators for students to work harder. |
| Development | string> dɪˈvɛləpmənt | Noun | The process of growing, progressing, or advancing towards a more complete state. | Improvement and growth over time. | This contributes significantly to their long-term individual development. |
6 Revised Essay
In the debate over assessment criteria, Paul contends that hard work should factor into a student's grade alongside performance. While this approach has its merits, I concur with Kelly's assertion that grades should be based solely on performance. In my opinion, this method offers a fairer environment for evaluating students' academic achievements. Specifically, it not only efficiently identifies students' performance levels but also fosters a healthy competitive atmosphere among them. Furthermore, these factors serve as potent motivators for students to work harder and contribute significantly to their long-term individual development. Consequently, I am steadfast in my belief that grades should be the exclusive means of assessing student performance.
学术讨论评分标准
托福学术讨论任务基于ETS官方评分标准进行评估。AI评估系统从多个维度分析每个回答。
相关性与贡献
回答是否针对问题并为讨论做出有意义的贡献?
语言运用
语法准确性、词汇丰富度和句式结构质量。
论述与支撑
观点是否充分展开,是否有具体例子和清晰推理支撑?
回答中的常见模式
基于对该题目用户提交内容的分析,以下是在学生回答中观察到的常见模式。
很多学生能清楚表达观点,但缺乏具体的论据支撑。
高分回答会直接引用阅读段落和其他发言者的观点。
更高分的回答使用多样化的句式结构和学术词汇。
时间管理是关键因素——匆忙完成的回答在论述发展方面得分较低。
学习建议
在开始写作前仔细阅读题目,理清问题的所有组成部分。
在回答中引用阅读段落和其他同学的观点。
使用具体例子来支持你的主要论点——避免笼统的表述。
目标字数120-150词。更长的回答不一定更好;清晰度和针对性更重要。
进行限时练习(10分钟),在考试条件下提升写作流畅度。
常见问题
什么是托福学术讨论任务?
学术讨论任务如何评分?
本页面上的用户样本是什么?
AI评估的准确度如何?
如何练习这道学术讨论题目?
学术讨论回答应该多长?
相关托福学术讨论题目
All TOEFL Writing Samples
Browse all user-submitted TOEFL writing samples with AI evaluation
TOEFL Academic Discussion Guide
Learn strategies and tips for the Academic Discussion writing task
TOEFL Writing Guide
Complete guide to all TOEFL writing task types and scoring
TOEFL Speaking Guide
Master all TOEFL speaking tasks with expert strategies
TOEFL Reading Guide
Strategies for TOEFL reading comprehension tasks
TOEFL Listening Guide
Tips and practice for TOEFL listening comprehension