TOEFL TPO -1 Academic Discussion Writing Sample: This week, I want you to discuss assessment criteria. Some schoolteachers give high grades (marks)only to those students who perform well on their homework assignments and tests. Other teachers,however, may give high grades to students who have worked very hard on their assignments buthave not performed so well. Which approach do you think is better: Giving grades based only onperformance, or grading students not just on performance but also on their effort?
真实用户提交的答案,配合AI智能评估与反馈
共有 1 份用户提交的样本
开始免费练习题目概览
Professor
This week, I want you to discuss assessment criteria. Some schoolteachers give high grades (marks)only to those students who perform well on their homework assignments and tests. Other teachers,however, may give high grades to students who have worked very hard on their assignments buthave not performed so well. Which approach do you think is better: Giving grades based only onperformance, or grading students not just on performance but also on their effort?
Kelly
I think grades should be based on performance only. It's a matter of fairness. I'd be really upset ifanother student got nearly the same grade that I did when I turned in work that was almost perfectand the other student's work had incorrect answers or unclear ideas. It wouldn't matter to me if theyworked harder.
Paul
Sure, evaluation should mainly be based upon the student's performance,but hard work shouldcount for something. A student who works hard, even when the final grade isn't the highest in theclass, builds character,which will benefit the student later in life when they go to university or applyfor a job.
用户样本与评估结果
用户样本
Paul presents a compelling argument in favor of ranking high scores for students who do not perform well but have a diligent attitude. Admittedly, cultivating a hard-working nature is taken adavantage for future appilance of students. Nevertheless, considering that modern educational environment requires not only a positive learning attitude, but also a strengthened acadaemic performence. I am inclined to point out that marking high marks for good-grade students can enhance the confidence level of those who have a strong talent in studying. Ranking high grades for students who establish well in acadaemic performence is eseentially a underlying motivation to them, instead of only a score. In other words, if a students get high-ranked in a exam, the other students, who have already knowed the score, may convey a admiring feeling to the student. That well-performed student, will actually feel more confident and have more stimulation in keeping working to get a high score because of a clear, strong and positive self-learning. Therefore, those talenetd students will continue towork in order to contribute their high scores.
评估结果
1. 子项得分
-
Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.0
-
Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 3.5
-
Language Use and Grammar: 3.0
2. 预估分数
22. 3 任务完成度
这篇文章在完成任务方面做得还不错,但仍有改进的空间。首先,文章在讨论评估标准时,只关注了成绩方面的因素,没有充分涉及到努力程度的考虑。其次,在阐述观点时,可以更具体地提供一些例子或者详细说明为什么基于表现给予高分是更好的方法。此外,在语言使用和语法方面也有一些错误,需要加以修正。
改进建议示例(英文):
-
在讨论评估标准时,请确保涵盖了努力程度的因素,并对两种方法进行比较。
-
在阐述观点时,请提供具体的例子或详细说明为什么基于表现给予高分是更好的方法。
4. 文章结构与组织
从结构和组织角度来看,这篇文章可以进一步改进。虽然文章包含了引言、主体和结论部分,但在段落之间缺乏明确的过渡。此外,在主体部分中可以更明确地划分出不同的观点和论据。最后,建议在结论部分总结文章的主要观点,并给出一个明确的结论。
改进建议示例(英文):
-
在段落之间加入过渡句,使文章在逻辑上更加连贯。
-
在主体部分中明确划分不同的观点和论据,并在结论部分总结文章的主要观点。
5. Grammar
Paul presents a compelling argument in favor of ranking high scores for students who do not perform well but have a diligent attitude. Admittedly, cultivating a hard-working nature is taken adavantageadvantage for future appilanceapplication of students. Nevertheless, considering that modern educational environment requires not only a positive learning attitude, but also a strengthened acadaemic performence.academic performance. I am inclined to point out that marking high marks for good-grade students can enhance the confidence level of those who have a strong talent in studying. Ranking high grades for students who establish well in acadaemic performenceacademic performance is eseentiallyessentially a underlying motivation to them, instead of only a score. In other words, if a students getstudent gets high-ranked in aan exam, the other students, who have already knowedknown the score, may convey aan admiring feeling to the student. That well-performed student,student will actually feel more confident and have more stimulation in keeping working to get a high score because of a clear, strongstrong, and positive self-learning. Therefore, those talenetdtalented students will continue toworkto work in order to contribute their high scores.
Section Title: 6 文章修订
Revised Essay:
Paul presents a compelling argument in favor of awarding high grades to students who demonstrate a diligent attitude, even if their performance is not outstanding. Indeed, cultivating a strong work ethic can be advantageous for students in their future endeavors. However, considering that the modern educational environment demands not only a positive learning attitude but also robust academic performance, I am inclined to argue that awarding high grades based on performance can enhance the confidence of academically talented students.
Assigning high grades to those who excel academically serves as an underlying motivation for them, rather than merely being a numerical score. In other words, when a student achieves a high rank in an exam and receives admiration from their peers, they are likely to feel more confident and motivated to maintain their strong performance due to this clear and positive reinforcement of their self-directed learning. Consequently, these talented students will continue striving for excellence, contributing further to their academic success. (166 words)
Paul presents a compelling argument in favor of ranking high scores for awarding (revised for clarity) high grades to students who do demonstrate (revised for clarity) a diligent attitude, even if their performance is not perform well but have a diligent attitude. Admittedly, outstanding. Indeed, cultivating a hard-working nature is taken adavantage for strong work ethic can be advantageous (corrected spelling) for students in their future appilance of students. Nevertheless, endeavors (revised for clarity). However, considering that the modern educational environment requires demands not only a positive learning attitude, attitude but also a strengthened acadaemic performence. robust academic performance (revised for clarity), I am inclined to point out argue that marking high marks for good-grade students awarding high grades based on performance can enhance the confidence level of academically talented students.
Assigning high grades to those who have a strong talent in studying. Ranking high grades for students who establish well in acadaemic performence is eseentially a excel academically serves as an underlying motivation to for them, instead of only a score. rather than merely being a numerical score (revised for clarity). In other words, if a students get high-ranked when a student achieves a high rank in a exam, the other students, who have already knowed the score, may convey a admiring feeling to the student. That well-performed student, will actually an exam and receives admiration from their peers (revised for clarity), they are likely to feel more confident and have more stimulation in keeping working to get a high score because of a clear, motivated to maintain their strong performance due to this clear and positive self-learning. Therefore, those talenetd reinforcement of their self-directed learning (revised for clarity). Consequently, these talented students will continue towork in order to contribute their high scores.striving for excellence, contributing further to their academic success.
Display title: 8 思维导图
1. Introduction
- Paul's argument
- Importance of work ethic
- Modern educational environment
2. High grades for performance
- Motivation for academically talented students
- Confidence boost
3. Positive reinforcement
- High rank in exams
- Admiration from peers
4. Self-directed learning
- Striving for excellence
- Academic success
Display title: 9 关键词
| Word | Phonetic Symbol | Part of Speech | English definition | Simplified Chinese translation | Sample sentences |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| compelling | /kəmˈpɛlɪŋ/ | adjective | evoking interest, attention, or admiration in a powerfully irresistible way | 引人注目的 | Paul presents a compelling argument in favor of awarding high grades to students who demonstrate a diligent attitude. |
| diligent | /ˈdɪlɪdʒənt/ | adjective | having or showing care and conscientiousness in one's work or duties | 勤奋的 | Students who demonstrate a diligent attitude should be awarded high grades. |
| endeavors | /ɪnˈdɛvər/ | noun | an attempt to achieve a goal; an enterprise or undertaking | 努力,尝试 | Cultivating a strong work ethic can be advantageous for students in their future endeavors. |
| robust | /roʊˈbʌst/ | adjective | strong and healthy; vigorous | _ |
学术讨论评分标准
托福学术讨论任务基于ETS官方评分标准进行评估。AI评估系统从多个维度分析每个回答。
相关性与贡献
回答是否针对问题并为讨论做出有意义的贡献?
语言运用
语法准确性、词汇丰富度和句式结构质量。
论述与支撑
观点是否充分展开,是否有具体例子和清晰推理支撑?
回答中的常见模式
基于对该题目用户提交内容的分析,以下是在学生回答中观察到的常见模式。
很多学生能清楚表达观点,但缺乏具体的论据支撑。
高分回答会直接引用阅读段落和其他发言者的观点。
更高分的回答使用多样化的句式结构和学术词汇。
时间管理是关键因素——匆忙完成的回答在论述发展方面得分较低。
学习建议
在开始写作前仔细阅读题目,理清问题的所有组成部分。
在回答中引用阅读段落和其他同学的观点。
使用具体例子来支持你的主要论点——避免笼统的表述。
目标字数120-150词。更长的回答不一定更好;清晰度和针对性更重要。
进行限时练习(10分钟),在考试条件下提升写作流畅度。
常见问题
什么是托福学术讨论任务?
学术讨论任务如何评分?
本页面上的用户样本是什么?
AI评估的准确度如何?
如何练习这道学术讨论题目?
学术讨论回答应该多长?
相关托福学术讨论题目
All TOEFL Writing Samples
Browse all user-submitted TOEFL writing samples with AI evaluation
TOEFL Academic Discussion Guide
Learn strategies and tips for the Academic Discussion writing task
TOEFL Writing Guide
Complete guide to all TOEFL writing task types and scoring
TOEFL Speaking Guide
Master all TOEFL speaking tasks with expert strategies
TOEFL Reading Guide
Strategies for TOEFL reading comprehension tasks
TOEFL Listening Guide
Tips and practice for TOEFL listening comprehension