TOEFL TPO -1 Academic Discussion Writing Sample: Should the government impose higher fines and taxes on high polluting enterprises?
真实用户提交的答案,配合AI智能评估与反馈
共有 1 份用户提交的样本
开始免费练习题目概览
Professor
Many companies provide important products and services but at the same time cause environmental damage. Some people believe the way to prevent these companies from damaging the environment is for the government to require more penalties from them, such as higher taxes and larger fines. Do you think it is a good idea?
Paul
A lot of companies make helpful products but hurt the environment too. I think the government should punish them more, like raising their taxes and fines, to stop the damage. Doing that would hold corporations accountable and force them to change in an impactful way. We can have both innovation and sustainability if governments incentivize it properly through penalties.
Claire
I disagree that we should penalize corporations more for environmental damage. Many companies are already taking steps to adopt greener practices, and higher taxes or fines could discourage innovation and hurt the economy. Instead of punishing businesses, I believe the government should reward and incentivize sustainable choices through subsidies and tax breaks.
用户样本与评估结果
用户样本
Admittedly, Claire is right because the higher taxes will discourage the companies taking steps to adopt greener practices. Because the higher taxes will let the companies lost a lot of money that they could not have enough money to be the green companies. Nevertheless, I think Paul is right that the government should punish the companies more, like raising their taxes and fines. In my opinion, the companies should pay more taxes to the government that can make the government have enough money to protect the environment. In other words, the more taxes would be a great punish for the companies. For example, if they had known damage the environment will get the punishments, they will not damage the environment. Therefore, I think punish the government will reduce the damage of the environment.
评估结果
1. 子项得分
-
Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.0
-
Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 3.5
-
Language Use and Grammar: 3.0
2. 预估分数
- 22
3. 任务完成度
这篇文章基本上回答了问题,但在阐述观点和论据方面还有待提高。首先,你需要更清晰地表达你的观点,并给出更具说服力的例子来支持你的观点。此外,在语法和词汇使用方面也需要加强。
改进建议示例(英文):
-
在支持你的观点时,可以提供一些具体的实例或数据,以增强说服力。例如:“根据一项研究,对高污染企业征收更高的税收和罚款后,它们在环保措施上的投入增加了20%。”
-
在语法和词汇使用方面,注意避免重复单词,并尝试使用更丰富、准确的表达。例如:“the more taxes would be a great punish for the companies” 可以改为 “higher taxes would serve as a significant deterrent for these companies”。
4. 文章结构与组织
文章结构方面还有待加强。虽然有简短的引言、主体段落和结论,但段落间缺乏明确的过渡,导致文章流畅度受到影响。此外,主体段落中的观点和论据需要更加有条理地组织。
改进建议示例(英文):
-
在段落之间添加过渡性词语或短语,以帮助读者更好地理解你的观点。例如,在引言和主体段落之间,可以加入:“In this essay, I will discuss the reasons why I agree with Paul's viewpoint and provide supporting evidence.”
-
在主体段落中,尝试使用主题句来引导每个段落的内容,并确保每个论据都与主题句紧密相关。例如:“One reason why higher taxes and fines are necessary is that they can provide the government with more resources to protect the environment.”
5. 语法批改
Admittedly, Claire is right because the higher taxes will discourage the companies taking steps to adopt greener practices. Because the higher taxes will let the companies lost a lot of money that they could not have enough money to be the green companies. Nevertheless, I think Paul is right that the government should punish the companies more, like raising their taxes and fines. In my opinion, the companies should pay more taxes to the government that can make the government have enough money to protect the environment. In other words, the more taxes would be a great punish for the companies. For example, if they had known damage the environment will get the punishments, they will not damage the environment. Therefore, I think punish the government will reduce the damage ofdamage to(Collocation: damage of/to) the environment. (Whitespace repetition (bad formatting))
Section Title: 6 Article Revision
While Claire raises a valid concern that higher taxes and fines may discourage companies from adopting greener practices due to financial constraints, I believe Paul's argument holds merit as well. Imposing stricter penalties, such as increased taxes and fines, can hold corporations accountable for their actions and compel them to make impactful changes. By requiring companies to contribute more financially, the government can allocate these additional funds towards environmental protection initiatives. In essence, the increased penalties serve as a deterrent for companies that might otherwise continue to harm the environment without consequence. Thus, I maintain that implementing stricter punishments can indeed contribute to reducing environmental damage caused by high-polluting enterprises. (115 words)
Admittedly, Revised essay: Section Title: 7 Article Revision
While Claire is right because the raises a valid concern (changed for better flow and clarity) that higher taxes will and fines may discourage the companies taking steps from adopting greener practices due to adopt greener practices. Because the higher financial constraints (rephrased for clarity), I believe Paul's argument holds merit as well (changed for better flow). Imposing stricter penalties, such as increased taxes will let the and fines, can hold corporations accountable for their actions (rephrased for clarity) and compel them to make impactful changes (added for emphasis). By requiring companies lost a lot of money that they could not have enough money to be the green companies. Nevertheless, I think Paul is right that contribute more financially, the government should punish can allocate these additional funds towards environmental protection initiatives (rephrased for clarity). In essence, the increased penalties serve as a deterrent for companies more, like raising their taxes and fines. In my opinion, the companies should pay more taxes that might otherwise continue to the government that can make the government have enough money to protect the environment. In other words, the more taxes would be a great punish for the companies. For example, if they had known damage harm the environment will get the punishments, they will not without consequence (rephrased for clarity). Thus, I maintain that implementing stricter punishments can indeed contribute to reducing environmental damage the environment. Therefore, I think punish the government will reduce the damage of the environment.caused by high-polluting enterprises (rephrased for better flow and emphasis).
8 思维导图
1. 引言
- Claire的观点:高税收和罚款可能会阻碍企业实施绿色环保措施
- Paul的观点:加大惩罚力度,如提高税收和罚款,可以促使企业采取行动减少污染
2. 企业责任
- 严格惩罚措施使企业对其行为负责
- 提高企业的环保意识
3. 政府角色
- 利用额外资金支持环境保护项目
- 确保公司遵守环境法规
4. 预防措施
- 提高税收和罚款作为威慑手段,防止公司继续破坏环境
5. 结论
- 实施更严格的惩罚措施有助于减少高污染企业造成的环境破坏
9 关键词
| Word | Phonetic Symbol | Part of Speech | English definition | Simplified Chinese translation | Sample sentences |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| concern | /kənˈsɜrn/ | noun | a matter of interest or importance to someone | 关注 | Claire raises a valid concern about the impact of higher taxes and fines on companies. |
| constraint | /kənˈstreɪnt/ | noun | a limitation or restriction | 约束 | Financial constraints may discourage companies from adopting greener practices. |
| accountable | /əˈkaʊntəbl/ | adjective | required or expected to justify actions or decisions | 有责任的 | Corporations should be held accountable for their actions that harm the environment. |
| allocate | /ˈæləkeɪt/ | verb | to distribute (resources or duties) for a particular purpose | 分配 | The government can allocate additional funds towards environmental protection initiatives. |
| deterrent | /dɪˈtɛrənt/ | noun | something that discourages or is intended to discourage someone from doing something | 威慑手段 | Increased penalties serve as a deterrent for companies that might otherwise continue to harm the environment. |
| consequence | /ˈkɒnsɪkwəns/ | noun | a result or effect of an action or condition | 后果 | Companies should consider the consequences of their actions on the environment. |
| implement | /ˈɪmplɪmənt/ | -verb | -to put (a decision, plan, agreement, etc.) into effect | -实施 | -Implementing stricter punishments can contribute to reducing environmental damage caused by high-polluting enterprises. |
| environmental | /ɪnvaɪrənˈmɛntl/ | -adjective | -relating to the natural world and the impact of human activity on its condition | -环境的 | -Environmental protection initiatives are crucial for preserving our planet. |
| enterprise | /ˈɛntərpraɪz/ | -noun | -a project or undertaking, typically one that is difficult or requires effort | -企业 | -High-polluting enterprises should be held responsible for their impact on the environment. |
学术讨论评分标准
托福学术讨论任务基于ETS官方评分标准进行评估。AI评估系统从多个维度分析每个回答。
相关性与贡献
回答是否针对问题并为讨论做出有意义的贡献?
语言运用
语法准确性、词汇丰富度和句式结构质量。
论述与支撑
观点是否充分展开,是否有具体例子和清晰推理支撑?
回答中的常见模式
基于对该题目用户提交内容的分析,以下是在学生回答中观察到的常见模式。
很多学生能清楚表达观点,但缺乏具体的论据支撑。
高分回答会直接引用阅读段落和其他发言者的观点。
更高分的回答使用多样化的句式结构和学术词汇。
时间管理是关键因素——匆忙完成的回答在论述发展方面得分较低。
学习建议
在开始写作前仔细阅读题目,理清问题的所有组成部分。
在回答中引用阅读段落和其他同学的观点。
使用具体例子来支持你的主要论点——避免笼统的表述。
目标字数120-150词。更长的回答不一定更好;清晰度和针对性更重要。
进行限时练习(10分钟),在考试条件下提升写作流畅度。
常见问题
什么是托福学术讨论任务?
学术讨论任务如何评分?
本页面上的用户样本是什么?
AI评估的准确度如何?
如何练习这道学术讨论题目?
学术讨论回答应该多长?
相关托福学术讨论题目
All TOEFL Writing Samples
Browse all user-submitted TOEFL writing samples with AI evaluation
TOEFL Academic Discussion Guide
Learn strategies and tips for the Academic Discussion writing task
TOEFL Writing Guide
Complete guide to all TOEFL writing task types and scoring
TOEFL Speaking Guide
Master all TOEFL speaking tasks with expert strategies
TOEFL Reading Guide
Strategies for TOEFL reading comprehension tasks
TOEFL Listening Guide
Tips and practice for TOEFL listening comprehension