TOEFL TPO -1 Academic Discussion Writing Sample: Professor: People now are using less cash, and more credit cards or mobile payments. Is it a good thing?
真实用户提交的答案,配合AI智能评估与反馈
共有 1 份用户提交的样本
开始免费练习题目概览
Professor
Professor: People now are using less cash, and more credit cards or mobile payments. Is it a good thing?
Student A
Student 1: Good, since mobile payment is convenient
Student B
Student 2: No
用户样本与评估结果
用户样本
In the realm of payments, there are none other than these two: mobile payment and cash. Either of these two approaches of payment has its merits and drawbacks. However, according to my understanding, I think the advantages of mobile payment outweigh those of cash. Firstly, convenience might be the most valuable merit for considering mobile payment. For example, if an individual wants to make a big purchase, such as car or house, electronic money might prove to be superior to cash because people don’t have to count the cash one by one and people have to carry the cash in a large bag, carry around, which is not pretty convenient for them to conduct. While paying by electronic money, people just need scan the QR code to pay for the items they attained. Plus, with tons of bacteria and germs on it, the use of cash is not pretty good for people’s health. However, without direct contacting with the cash, the mobile payment tends to be much healthier because the chance of getting infected by bacteria and germs is almost zero. Therefore, sanitation is another advantage for people to make use of mobile payment rather than cash. Some people might argue against my point by claiming that cash payment might make people become more aware of saving money, compared with mobile payment which might promote financial recklessness. Well, there are some truths regarding that argument because with just a digital number, mobile payment prompts people to be spendthrift. However, individual’s real financial conditions will prevent people from dissipating. Therefore, taking into what I have just mentioned, the benefits absolutely outweighs the disadvantages.
评估结果
1. Sub Scores:
Relevance and Contribution to Discussion: 4.5 Clarity and Elaboration of Viewpoint: 4.0 Language Use and Grammar: 4.0
2. Estimated Scores:
Estimated Score: 27
3. Task completeness:
The essay does a good job of addressing the question about whether using less cash and more mobile payments is a good thing. The writer presents a clear viewpoint in favor of mobile payments, citing convenience and sanitation as advantages. However, the essay could benefit from providing more specific examples or evidence to support the claims made.
Suggestions for improvement:
-
Include more specific examples or evidence to support your points.
-
Address potential counterarguments more thoroughly.
Examples:
- To support the convenience of mobile payments, you could mention how they allow for faster transactions at stores, reducing wait times for customers.
- To address counterarguments, you could discuss how security measures like encryption and biometric authentication help protect users' financial information when using mobile payments.
4. Essay structure and organization:
The essay has a clear structure with an introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion. Each paragraph focuses on a specific point with supporting details. However, transitions between ideas and paragraphs could be improved to create a smoother flow throughout the essay.
Suggestions for improvement:
-
Use transition words or phrases to connect ideas within paragraphs.
-
Ensure that each paragraph has a clear topic sentence that introduces its main point.
Examples:
- In your second paragraph, you could use a transition phrase like "In addition to convenience" before discussing sanitation as another advantage of mobile payments.
- For your counterargument paragraph, start with a topic sentence like "Some may argue that cash payments encourage better financial habits." This will clearly introduce the main point of the paragraph before addressing it in detail.
5. Grammar
In the realm of payments, there are none other than these two: mobile payment and cash. Either of these two approaches of payment has its merits and drawbacks. However, according to my understanding, I think the advantages of mobile payment outweigh those of cash.
Firstly, convenience might be the most valuable merit for considering mobile payment. For example, if an individual wants to make a big purchase, such as car or house, electronic money might prove to be superior to cash because people don’t have to count the cash one by one and people have to carry the cash in a large bag, carry around, which is not pretty convenient for them to conduct. While paying by electronic money, people just need scanneed to scan(Use 'to' before the base form of a verb) the QR code to pay for the items they attained.
Plus, with tons of bacteria and germs on it, the use of cash is not pretty good for people’s health. However, without direct contacting with the cash, the mobile payment tends to be much healthier because the chance of getting infected by bacteria and germs is almost zero. Therefore, sanitation is another advantage for people to make use of mobile payment rather than cash.
Some people might argue against my point by claiming that cash payment might make people become more aware of saving money, compared with mobile payment which might promote financial recklessness. Well, there are some truths regarding that argument because with just a digital number, mobile payment prompts people to be spendthrift. However, individual’s real financial conditions will prevent people from dissipating. Therefore, taking into what I have just mentioned, the benefits absolutely outweighsoutweigh(punctuation + plural noun + singular verb) the disadvantages.
Display title: 6 Revised Essay
In the ever-evolving world of financial transactions, two primary methods of payment dominate the landscape: mobile payments and cash. Each approach has its own set of advantages and disadvantages. However, in my opinion, the benefits of mobile payments far outweigh those of cash transactions.
First and foremost, convenience is a significant factor that makes mobile payments more appealing than cash. For instance, when making a large purchase such as a car or a house, electronic money is far superior to cash. There is no need to count bills one by one or carry large sums of money in bags, which can be cumbersome and inconvenient. Instead, with mobile payments, individuals simply need to scan a QR code to complete their transaction.
Additionally, from a health perspective, mobile payments are a more sanitary option compared to using cash. Currency notes are known to harbor bacteria and germs due to their constant circulation among people. In contrast, mobile payments eliminate direct contact with physical money, significantly reducing the risk of infection from bacteria and germs. Thus, hygiene serves as another compelling reason for people to opt for mobile payments over cash.
Opponents of this viewpoint may argue that using cash encourages better financial awareness and promotes saving money since it is tangible compared to the abstract nature of digital numbers in mobile payment systems. While there is some truth in this argument as digital transactions can potentially lead individuals towards frivolous spending habits, it is essential to consider that one's actual financial situation will ultimately serve as a check against excessive spending.
In light of these points, it becomes evident that the advantages of mobile payments significantly outweigh their drawbacks when compared to traditional cash transactions. Embracing this modern method offers convenience and improved hygiene while still allowing individuals to maintain control over their finances. (308 words)
In the realm of payments, there are none other than these two: mobile ever-evolving world of financial transactions (clarification for better understanding), two primary methods of payment and cash. Either of these two approaches of payment dominate the landscape: mobile payments and cash. Each approach has its merits and drawbacks. own set of advantages and disadvantages. However, according to in my understanding, I think the advantages of mobile payment opinion (for a more natural tone), the benefits of mobile payments far outweigh those of cash. cash transactions.
Firstly, First and foremost, convenience might be the most valuable merit for considering mobile payment. is a significant factor that makes mobile payments more appealing than cash. For example, if an individual wants to make a big purchase, instance, when making a large purchase such as a car or a house, electronic money might prove to be is far superior to cash because people don’t have cash. There is no need to count the cash bills one by one and people have to or carry the cash large sums of money in a large bag, carry around, bags, which is not pretty convenient for them to conduct. While paying by electronic money, people just can be cumbersome and inconvenient (improved phrasing for clarity). Instead, with mobile payments, individuals simply need to scan the a QR code to pay for the items they attained. complete their transaction.
Plus, Additionally, from a health perspective (clarification for better understanding), mobile payments are a more sanitary option compared to using cash. Currency notes are known to harbor bacteria and germs due to their constant circulation among people. In contrast, mobile payments eliminate direct contact with tons of physical money, significantly reducing the risk of infection from bacteria and germs on it, the use of (improved phrasing for clarity). Thus, hygiene serves as another compelling reason for people to opt for mobile payments over cash.
Opponents of this viewpoint may argue that using cash is not pretty good for people’s health. However, without direct contacting with the cash, the encourages better financial awareness and promotes saving money since it is tangible compared to the abstract nature of digital numbers in mobile payment tends to be much healthier because the chance of getting infected by bacteria and germs is almost zero. Therefore, sanitation is another advantage for people to make use of mobile payment rather than cash. systems (clarification for better understanding). While there is some truth in this argument as digital transactions can potentially lead individuals towards frivolous spending habits (improved phrasing for clarity), it is essential to consider that one's actual financial situation will ultimately serve as a check against excessive spending.
Some people might argue against my point by claiming In light of these points (for a more natural tone), it becomes evident that the advantages of mobile payments significantly outweigh their drawbacks when compared to traditional cash payment might make people become more aware of saving money, compared with mobile payment which might promote financial recklessness. Well, there are some truths regarding that argument because with just a digital number, mobile payment prompts people to be spendthrift. However, individual’s real financial conditions will prevent people from dissipating. Therefore, taking into what I have just mentioned, the benefits absolutely outweighs the disadvantages.transactions. Embracing this modern method offers convenience and improved hygiene while still allowing individuals to maintain control over their finances.
Display title: 8 Mind Map
1. Introduction
- Mobile payments vs. cash
- Thesis: benefits of mobile payments outweigh cash transactions
2. Convenience
- Large purchases (e.g., car, house)
- No need to count bills or carry large sums
- QR code scanning for transactions
3. Health and hygiene
- Currency notes harbor bacteria and germs
- Mobile payments eliminate direct contact with physical money
- Reduced risk of infection from bacteria and germs
4. Counterargument: financial awareness and saving money
- Tangibility of cash vs. abstract nature of digital numbers in mobile payment systems
- Potential for frivolous spending habits with digital transactions
5. Rebuttal to counterargument
- Actual financial situation serves as a check against excessive spending
6. Conclusion
- Advantages of mobile payments outweigh drawbacks compared to cash transactions
Display title: 9 Key Words
| Word | Phonetic Symbol | Part of Speech | English Definition | English Translation | Sample Sentence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| dominate | /ˈdɒmɪneɪt/ | verb | To have control or power over something | Mobile payments and cash dominate the landscape of financial transactions. | |
| cumbersome | /ˈkʌmbərsəm/ | adjective | Large or heavy, difficult to carry | Carrying large sums of money in bags can be cumbersome and inconvenient. | |
| hygiene | /ˈhaɪdʒiːn/ | noun | Conditions or practices conducive to maintaining health and preventing disease | Hygiene serves as another compelling reason for people to opt for mobile payments over cash. | |
| tangible | /ˈtændʒɪbəl/ | adjective | Perceptible by touch | Cash is tangible compared to the abstract nature of digital numbers in mobile payment systems. | |
| frivolous | /ˈfrɪvələs/ | adjective | Not having any serious purpose or value | Digital transactions can potentially lead individuals towards frivolous spending habits. | |
| circulation | /sɜːrkjʊˈleɪʃn/ | noun | The movement of something around a system | Currency notes are known to harbor bacteria and germs due to their constant circulation among people. | |
| infection | /ɪnˈfekʃn/ | noun | The process of infecting or the state of being infected | Mobile payments significantly reduce the risk of infection from bacteria and germs. | |
| excessive | /ɪkˈsesɪv/ | adjective | - More than is necessary, normal, or desirable; immoderate | - | - One's actual financial situation will ultimately serve as a check against excessive spending. |
| drawbacks | /ˈdrɔ:bæk/ | -noun | - A feature that renders something less acceptable; a disadvantage or problem | - | - It becomes evident that the advantages of mobile payments significantly outweigh their drawbacks. |
学术讨论评分标准
托福学术讨论任务基于ETS官方评分标准进行评估。AI评估系统从多个维度分析每个回答。
相关性与贡献
回答是否针对问题并为讨论做出有意义的贡献?
语言运用
语法准确性、词汇丰富度和句式结构质量。
论述与支撑
观点是否充分展开,是否有具体例子和清晰推理支撑?
回答中的常见模式
基于对该题目用户提交内容的分析,以下是在学生回答中观察到的常见模式。
很多学生能清楚表达观点,但缺乏具体的论据支撑。
高分回答会直接引用阅读段落和其他发言者的观点。
更高分的回答使用多样化的句式结构和学术词汇。
时间管理是关键因素——匆忙完成的回答在论述发展方面得分较低。
学习建议
在开始写作前仔细阅读题目,理清问题的所有组成部分。
在回答中引用阅读段落和其他同学的观点。
使用具体例子来支持你的主要论点——避免笼统的表述。
目标字数120-150词。更长的回答不一定更好;清晰度和针对性更重要。
进行限时练习(10分钟),在考试条件下提升写作流畅度。
常见问题
什么是托福学术讨论任务?
学术讨论任务如何评分?
本页面上的用户样本是什么?
AI评估的准确度如何?
如何练习这道学术讨论题目?
学术讨论回答应该多长?
相关托福学术讨论题目
All TOEFL Writing Samples
Browse all user-submitted TOEFL writing samples with AI evaluation
TOEFL Academic Discussion Guide
Learn strategies and tips for the Academic Discussion writing task
TOEFL Writing Guide
Complete guide to all TOEFL writing task types and scoring
TOEFL Speaking Guide
Master all TOEFL speaking tasks with expert strategies
TOEFL Reading Guide
Strategies for TOEFL reading comprehension tasks
TOEFL Listening Guide
Tips and practice for TOEFL listening comprehension