TOEFL TPO -1 Writing Task 1 Sample: summarize the points made in the listening, be sure to explain how they respond to specific points in the reading

1.子项得分 Task fulfillment: 4 Organization: 4 Coherence and Cohesion: 4 Language Use: 3

2.预估分数 Estimated Score: 25

3.任务完成度 虽然文章基本上回答了问题，但在解释听力部分如何回应阅读部分的具体观点时，可以更详细地描述听力中提到的例子和证据。此外，注意避免使用拼写错误和语法错误。

改进建议的英文示例：

1. "Conversely, the speaker refutes this point by stating that it can't be 100% effective, as some rootworms will survive the application of insecticides and build a tolerance, which could be passed on to their offspring. This has already been observed in some areas where corn rootworm populations have become resistant to certain insecticides."

2. "Nevertheless, the speaker opposes this idea by mentioning that rootworm eggs can remain dormant in the soil for up to two years, allowing them to survive unfavorable conditions and hatch when corn crops are planted again."

4.文章结构与组织 The essay has a clear structure with an introduction, body paragraphs addressing each point from the listening passage, and a conclusion. However, transitions between ideas could be improved for better coherence and cohesion.

Suggestions for improvement:

1. Improve transitions between ideas by using appropriate linking words or phrases.

2. Make sure each paragraph focuses on one specific point from the listening passage and provides enough supporting details.

Examples in English:

1. "Firstly, while the reading claims that applying insecticides is an effective method of pest control, the speaker counters this argument by highlighting its limitations."

2. "In contrast to the reading's assertion that planting corn crops earlier in the growing season is beneficial, the speaker points out potential drawbacks, such as damage from adverse weather conditions."

5. 语法批改

The reading primarily talks about three methods farmers use to combat corn rootwormsroot worms(misspelling),which, which(Use of whitespace before comma and before/after parentheses) cause great damage to corns. However, the listening challenges what is stated in the reading passage by presenting three compelling counterarguments to undermine their validity.

Firstly, the reading claims that applying inscticidesinsecticides(misspelling) to soil in areas that have a history of crop damage is an effective way. Conversely, the speaker refutes this point by stating that it can't be 100% effective. Few corn rootwormsroot worms(misspelling) will survive the application of insceticidesinsecticides(misspelling) and build a tolerance. If the gene of tolerance is passed on to the off-spring, future generations can survive tehthe(misspelling) insecticides. It has been observed in some crop areas that corn rootwormsroot worms(misspelling) develop resistenceresistance(misspelling) to insecticides. Over time, insecticides will have limited impact on controlling insect populations.

Secondly, the reading asserts that planting corns earlier in the growing season makes sense. In contrast, the speaker maintains an opposite opinonopinion(misspelling), arguing that (Two consecutive spaces)there is always potential for crop damage incurred by adverse weather conditions sunchsuch(misspelling) as cold weather or snowstorms. In this case, the damage from adverse weathers anfANF(misspelling) corn rootwormsroot worms(misspelling) are the same.

Finally, the reading contends that crop rotation can be successful, since it helps starve rootwormroot worm(misspelling) larvae so they can't grow mature to adulthood. Nevertheless, the speaker opposes this idea by mentioning that larvae can stay dominant in soil for 2 years before hatching. Hence, they survive even in unfavorable conditions.

In summary, each approach proposed in the reading passage to address damage caused by corn rootwormsroot worms(misspelling) is effectively countered by the listening.

Section Title: 6.文章修订

The reading primarily discusses three methods farmers employ to combat corn rootworms, which cause significant damage to corn crops. However, the listening challenges the assertions made in the reading passage by presenting three compelling counterarguments that undermine their validity.

Firstly, the reading claims that applying insecticides to soil in areas with a history of crop damage is an effective strategy. Conversely, the speaker refutes this point by stating that it cannot be 100% effective. A few corn rootworms will survive the application of insecticides and develop a tolerance. If this tolerance gene is passed on to their offspring, future generations may become resistant to insecticides. This phenomenon has been observed in some crop areas where corn rootworms have developed resistance to certain insecticides. Over time, insecticides will have a limited impact on controlling insect populations.

Secondly, the reading asserts that planting corn earlier in the growing season is a sensible approach. In contrast, the speaker maintains an opposing opinion, arguing that there is always potential for crop damage incurred by adverse weather conditions such as frost damage, cold weather, or snowstorms. In this case, the damage from adverse weather and corn rootworms are equally detrimental.

Finally, the reading contends that crop rotation can be successful since it helps starve rootworm larvae so they cannot mature into adulthood. Nevertheless, the speaker opposes this idea by mentioning that larvae can remain dormant in soil for up to two years before hatching. Consequently, they can survive even under unfavorable conditions.

In summary, each approach proposed in the reading passage to address damage caused by corn rootworms is effectively countered by points made in the listening segment. (276 words)

Revised essay: Section Title: 7.文章批改

The reading primarily talks about discusses three methods farmers use employ to combat corn rootworms,which rootworms, which cause great damage to corns. significant damage to corn crops (changed "corns" to "corn crops" for clarity and proper terminology). However, the listening challenges what is stated the assertions made in the reading passage by presenting three compelling counterarguments to that undermine their validity.

Firstly, the reading claims that applying inscticides insecticides (corrected spelling) to soil in areas that have with a history of crop damage is an effective way. strategy. Conversely, the speaker refutes this point by stating that it can't cannot be 100% effective. Few A few corn rootworms will survive the application of insceticides insecticides and build develop a tolerance. If the this tolerance gene of tolerance is passed on to the off-spring, their offspring, future generations can survive teh may become resistant to insecticides. It This phenomenon has been observed in some crop areas that where corn rootworms develop resistence to have developed resistance to certain insecticides. Over time, insecticides will have a limited impact on controlling insect populations.

Secondly, the reading asserts that planting corns corn earlier in the growing season makes sense. is a sensible approach. In contrast, the speaker maintains an opposite opinon, opposing opinion (changed "opposite opinon" to "opposing opinion" for proper word choice), arguing that that there is always potential for crop damage incurred by adverse weather conditions sunch such as frost damage (added "frost damage" for clarity), cold weather weather, or snowstorms. In this case, the damage from adverse weathers anf weather and corn rootworms are the same. equally detrimental.

Finally, the reading contends that crop rotation can be successful, successful since it helps starve rootworm larvae so they can't grow cannot mature to into adulthood. Nevertheless, the speaker opposes this idea by mentioning that larvae can stay dominant remain dormant (corrected spelling) in soil for 2 up to two years before hatching. Hence, Consequently, they can survive even in under unfavorable conditions.

In summary, each approach proposed in the reading passage to address damage caused by corn rootworms is effectively countered by the listening.points made in the listening segment.

8. Mind Map

• Introduction

  • Reading: Three methods to combat corn rootworms
  • Listening: Challenges the assertions

• Method 1: Insecticides

  • Reading: Effective strategy
  • Listening: Resistance development, limited impact over time

• Method 2: Early planting

  • Reading: Sensible approach
  • Listening: Adverse weather conditions, equal damage potential

• Method 3: Crop rotation

  • Reading: Starves rootworm larvae
  • Listening: Dormant larvae, survival under unfavorable conditions

• Conclusion

  • Summary of counterarguments from listening segment

9. Keywords